Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
The NO Vote Once Again Prevails!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Inthegame" data-source="post: 1207225" data-attributes="member: 37112"><p>I'm not sure why you consider a common factual post a "compilation of wisdom" but I'll bite. Actually my last sentence had more of a speculative angle than sentence #3. <em>Should </em>is more predictive of hypothetical events and refers back to TDU logic which is totally hypothetical. <em>Could</em> or <em>would</em> feels more certain based on history but also is predictive. </p><p>In your dissection of words you may have missed the point...the yes vote gained while the no vote lost support. <u>More</u> ballots were returned in large Locals 638 and 344 (and L804) than in the first round, while less ballots were returned in L89, the No vote stronghold. The No Vote campaign, pushed hard by TDU, lost support even in locals that voted no in the majority.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Inthegame, post: 1207225, member: 37112"] I'm not sure why you consider a common factual post a "compilation of wisdom" but I'll bite. Actually my last sentence had more of a speculative angle than sentence #3. [I]Should [/I]is more predictive of hypothetical events and refers back to TDU logic which is totally hypothetical. [I]Could[/I] or [I]would[/I] feels more certain based on history but also is predictive. In your dissection of words you may have missed the point...the yes vote gained while the no vote lost support. [U]More[/U] ballots were returned in large Locals 638 and 344 (and L804) than in the first round, while less ballots were returned in L89, the No vote stronghold. The No Vote campaign, pushed hard by TDU, lost support even in locals that voted no in the majority. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
The NO Vote Once Again Prevails!
Top