Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
The Truth About Right to Work (for less) in Indiana
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PobreCarlos" data-source="post: 934671" data-attributes="member: 16651"><p>menotyou;</p><p></p><p>I'm trying hard to reconcile your declaration that...</p><p></p><p>"I am not spending my day going through your argument with Crowbar to see if you countered every point Mr. Hounsell made."</p><p></p><p>...with your prior claim that...</p><p></p><p>"You did not respond to the comments Mr. Hounsell made."</p><p></p><p>If you did not CHECK to see if I'd responded, then how could you DECLARE that I had *NOT* responded?</p><p></p><p>See a problem there? Don't think there's an element of dishonesty in the dichotomy of those two statements?</p><p></p><p>I suggest you go back through the posts (realizing that is an immense imposition on Teamsters such as yourself to ask them to actually FAMILIARIZE themselves with the facts before shooting off their mouths!) and see which points I *DID* make (mostly quite directly) which were responsive to Mr. Hounsell's comments. The only one that I can think of off-hand is his piece that I wasn't responsive to was his...</p><p></p><p>"It should be noted that the bill’s sponsors choose the language of both the title and the analysis."</p><p></p><p>...to which I would say "whoop-dee-doo!"...as if sponsors - on any and every side of the political spectrum -don't ROUTINELY "choose the language of both the title and the analysis".</p><p></p><p>Also, while fully aware that might be too great a task to ask as well, you might also want to review my points on this thread regarding your last (highlighted) paragraph before trying to "smoke" it by me.</p><p></p><p>With the above in mind, (and not excluding your calling of "crowbar's" direct misquoting of me "opinion") I'll amend my judgement and say that, while you may be an "enthusiastic" Teamster, your last series of posts have pretty much demonstrated that you're far from being an "honest" or particularly "intelligent" one. </p><p></p><p>It seem that, like Diogenes, I'm still looking.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PobreCarlos, post: 934671, member: 16651"] menotyou; I'm trying hard to reconcile your declaration that... "I am not spending my day going through your argument with Crowbar to see if you countered every point Mr. Hounsell made." ...with your prior claim that... "You did not respond to the comments Mr. Hounsell made." If you did not CHECK to see if I'd responded, then how could you DECLARE that I had *NOT* responded? See a problem there? Don't think there's an element of dishonesty in the dichotomy of those two statements? I suggest you go back through the posts (realizing that is an immense imposition on Teamsters such as yourself to ask them to actually FAMILIARIZE themselves with the facts before shooting off their mouths!) and see which points I *DID* make (mostly quite directly) which were responsive to Mr. Hounsell's comments. The only one that I can think of off-hand is his piece that I wasn't responsive to was his... "It should be noted that the bill’s sponsors choose the language of both the title and the analysis." ...to which I would say "whoop-dee-doo!"...as if sponsors - on any and every side of the political spectrum -don't ROUTINELY "choose the language of both the title and the analysis". Also, while fully aware that might be too great a task to ask as well, you might also want to review my points on this thread regarding your last (highlighted) paragraph before trying to "smoke" it by me. With the above in mind, (and not excluding your calling of "crowbar's" direct misquoting of me "opinion") I'll amend my judgement and say that, while you may be an "enthusiastic" Teamster, your last series of posts have pretty much demonstrated that you're far from being an "honest" or particularly "intelligent" one. It seem that, like Diogenes, I'm still looking. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
The Truth About Right to Work (for less) in Indiana
Top