Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Time For A Reality Check
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tieguy" data-source="post: 73434" data-attributes="member: 1912"><p><span style="color: navy">I thought this was a terrific point to make. I think it captures suzie at her best. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #000080">1) first quote highlight in blue is a slam on us for supposedly believing everything bush tells us. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #000080">2) Second part with the highlight in red shows where she shows a willingness to believe an unnamed source known as "someone who was there" over a credible source like the president of the united states. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #000080">3) Third part in green; shows the contradiction, her ignorance of the military and her willingness to believe the unnamed source without verifying the accuracy of that sources information. The reference as anyone who is familiar with the military knows is very flawed. One of the green berets missions is to take indigenous personnel and train them on how to fight in combat. They basically recruit and form these battalions, train them and then actually accompany these units as they learn how to fight in actual combat situations. While they do participate in the actual combat they progress to a role as advisors as the trained unit learns to fight on its own. Since these green beret groups work in groups of 10 or 11 troops the idea that they are somehow leading these iraqi troops into combat as if they were a battalion of american troops is laughable. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #000080">The point is also made that the Iraqi troops work with american command and control guidance. Again anyone who has a clue knows the option to the Iraqi troops doing so would be to either fight seperately of american command and control or to have more seasoned more experienced american troops work under Iraqi command and control. Either option is not realistic and obviously not as effective. The quote from this "someone who was there" shows that persons ignorance of military tactics. If the number of battalians listed by Bush was accurate which it was then the presidents statement that Iraqi troops led the charge is 100 percent accurate. This point again highlights why our troops in Iraq are not getting a fair shake from the media. This "someone who was there" person either did not understand what they were seeing or deliberately misreported the events knowing gullible bush haters like Suzie would buy it hook, line and sinker.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #000080">It is good to see that Suzie is at least consistent in continously biting on the hook that is cast her way. </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tieguy, post: 73434, member: 1912"] [COLOR=navy]I thought this was a terrific point to make. I think it captures suzie at her best. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#000080][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000080]1) first quote highlight in blue is a slam on us for supposedly believing everything bush tells us. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#000080][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000080]2) Second part with the highlight in red shows where she shows a willingness to believe an unnamed source known as "someone who was there" over a credible source like the president of the united states. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#000080][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000080]3) Third part in green; shows the contradiction, her ignorance of the military and her willingness to believe the unnamed source without verifying the accuracy of that sources information. The reference as anyone who is familiar with the military knows is very flawed. One of the green berets missions is to take indigenous personnel and train them on how to fight in combat. They basically recruit and form these battalions, train them and then actually accompany these units as they learn how to fight in actual combat situations. While they do participate in the actual combat they progress to a role as advisors as the trained unit learns to fight on its own. Since these green beret groups work in groups of 10 or 11 troops the idea that they are somehow leading these iraqi troops into combat as if they were a battalion of american troops is laughable. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#000080][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000080]The point is also made that the Iraqi troops work with american command and control guidance. Again anyone who has a clue knows the option to the Iraqi troops doing so would be to either fight seperately of american command and control or to have more seasoned more experienced american troops work under Iraqi command and control. Either option is not realistic and obviously not as effective. The quote from this "someone who was there" shows that persons ignorance of military tactics. If the number of battalians listed by Bush was accurate which it was then the presidents statement that Iraqi troops led the charge is 100 percent accurate. This point again highlights why our troops in Iraq are not getting a fair shake from the media. This "someone who was there" person either did not understand what they were seeing or deliberately misreported the events knowing gullible bush haters like Suzie would buy it hook, line and sinker.[/COLOR] [COLOR=#000080][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000080]It is good to see that Suzie is at least consistent in continously biting on the hook that is cast her way. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#000080][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Time For A Reality Check
Top