Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Time For A Reality Check
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="susiedriver" data-source="post: 73523" data-attributes="member: 1848"><p>Once again you are calling into question the remarks of Mr. Ware, backed up by the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. You yourself admit that the Iraqis would not be capable of leading such an operation. Admit it; bush embellished the Iraqis leadership role to suit his purpose. Just as he embellished Saddams weapons to justify an ill conceived invasion. He is the one who dismantled the Iraqi Army after the invasion. They have very little leadership at this point. Hopefully that will change soon, though one could wonder why, after nearly 1000 days, we havent trained a capable officers corps in Iraq yet.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p> My point exactly. Why would Bush imply that?</p><p> </p><p> No, you must concede. The source was accurate in saying that the Iraqis were led by Green Beret forces and the entire operation was under the C&C of the US. The facts were misrepresented by the President. </p><p> </p><p>Actually, no, your point as nebulous as it is, is just a Republican talking point. You ask for imaginary figures, yet cant come up with any real figures of your own. When asked how many Saddam killed in the two years leading up to the invasion, you throw out references to the Iran-Iraq War or Gulf War One. I have yet to see one fact presented by you, not one, big fella. Could it be that you have no facts to back up whatever point you claim to have made? The only point I can see is that there is no way the Iraqi Army could have possibly led the attack on Tal Afar. Thanks for proving that, and ducking every other question put to you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="susiedriver, post: 73523, member: 1848"] Once again you are calling into question the remarks of Mr. Ware, backed up by the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. You yourself admit that the Iraqis would not be capable of leading such an operation. Admit it; bush embellished the Iraqis leadership role to suit his purpose. Just as he embellished Saddams weapons to justify an ill conceived invasion. He is the one who dismantled the Iraqi Army after the invasion. They have very little leadership at this point. Hopefully that will change soon, though one could wonder why, after nearly 1000 days, we havent trained a capable officers corps in Iraq yet. My point exactly. Why would Bush imply that? No, you must concede. The source was accurate in saying that the Iraqis were led by Green Beret forces and the entire operation was under the C&C of the US. The facts were misrepresented by the President. Actually, no, your point as nebulous as it is, is just a Republican talking point. You ask for imaginary figures, yet cant come up with any real figures of your own. When asked how many Saddam killed in the two years leading up to the invasion, you throw out references to the Iran-Iraq War or Gulf War One. I have yet to see one fact presented by you, not one, big fella. Could it be that you have no facts to back up whatever point you claim to have made? The only point I can see is that there is no way the Iraqi Army could have possibly led the attack on Tal Afar. Thanks for proving that, and ducking every other question put to you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Time For A Reality Check
Top