Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tonyexpress" data-source="post: 4742795" data-attributes="member: 1940">So much uniting it is comforting and baffling at the same time! LMAO... P.S. you&#039;ve worn out your allotted use of the big bad word &quot;insurrection&quot;... It&#039;s like a kid with a new toy.&nbsp; <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group2/devil2.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":devil2:" title="Devil2&nbsp; &nbsp; :devil2:" data-shortname=":devil2:" /><h3><a href="https://www.creators.com/read/thomas-sowell/01/21/is-truth-irrelevant" target="_blank">Is Truth Irrelevant?</a></h3>It is amazing how many people seem to have discovered last Wednesday that riots are wrong — when many of those same people apparently had not noticed that when riots went on, for weeks or even months, in various cities across the country last year.For too many people, especially in the media, what is right and wrong, true or false, depends on who it helps or hurts politically. Too many media people who are supposed to be reporters act as if they are combatants in political wars.Someone once said that, in a war, truth is the first casualty. That has certainly been so in the media — and in much of academia as well.One of the most grotesque distortions growing out of this carelessness with the facts has been a removal of Abraham Lincoln&#039;s name and statues from various places, on grounds that he saw black people only as property.Such criticisms betray an incredible ignorance of history — or else a complete disregard of truth.As a lawyer, Abraham Lincoln knew that there was nothing in the Constitution which authorized him or any other President to free slaves. But he also knew that a military commander in wartime can legally seize the property of an enemy nation.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Defining slaves as property gave President Lincoln the only legal authority he had to seize them during the Civil War. And once they were seized as property, he could then free them as human beings.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tonyexpress, post: 4742795, member: 1940"] So much uniting it is comforting and baffling at the same time! LMAO... P.S. you've worn out your allotted use of the big bad word "insurrection"... It's like a kid with a new toy. :devil2: [HEADING=2][URL='https://www.creators.com/read/thomas-sowell/01/21/is-truth-irrelevant'][SIZE=5]Is Truth Irrelevant?[/SIZE][/URL][/HEADING] It is amazing how many people seem to have discovered last Wednesday that riots are wrong — when many of those same people apparently had not noticed that when riots went on, for weeks or even months, in various cities across the country last year. For too many people, especially in the media, what is right and wrong, true or false, depends on who it helps or hurts politically. Too many media people who are supposed to be reporters act as if they are combatants in political wars. Someone once said that, in a war, truth is the first casualty. That has certainly been so in the media — and in much of academia as well. One of the most grotesque distortions growing out of this carelessness with the facts has been a removal of Abraham Lincoln's name and statues from various places, on grounds that he saw black people only as property. Such criticisms betray an incredible ignorance of history — or else a complete disregard of truth. As a lawyer, Abraham Lincoln knew that there was nothing in the Constitution which authorized him or any other President to free slaves. But he also knew that a military commander in wartime can legally seize the property of an enemy nation. Defining slaves as property gave President Lincoln the only legal authority he had to seize them during the Civil War. And once they were seized as property, he could then free them as human beings. [/QUOTE]

Verification