Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
The Latest UPS Headlines
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. v. POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Turdferguson" data-source="post: 3525825" data-attributes="member: 61703"><p>Holy crap that was hard to read.</p><p></p><p>"Here, too, UPS responds that the Commission itself relies on a constant-elasticity assumption when extrapolating backward from present values to estimate a product's incremental cost"</p><p>Who talks like that?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Turdferguson, post: 3525825, member: 61703"] Holy crap that was hard to read. "Here, too, UPS responds that the Commission itself relies on a constant-elasticity assumption when extrapolating backward from present values to estimate a product's incremental cost" Who talks like that? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
The Latest UPS Headlines
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. v. POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
Top