I would never expect to this from a company that voted most ethical company by the magazine Ethisphere magazine. http://www.browncafe.com/forum/f6/ethical-315801/ and most admired company by FORTUNE magazine. http://www.transportweekly.com/pages/en/news/articles/71147/ You have to GOOGLE UPS Lawsuits to find the class action lawsuits. The link does'nt work on Browncafe. Heres the basics of the class action. Scott+Scott is litigating an employment discrimination action against United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”) – Mark Hohider, et al. v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al., and Branum v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al., Consolidated Civil Action No. 04-0363 (W.D. Pa.). Unfortunately, on July 23, 2009 the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the July 16, 2007 decision of the District Court, granting class action status to all persons throughout the U.S. employed by UPS at any time since May 10, 2000 who were denied the ability to return to work at UPS after an illness or injury because of one or more of the following three policies: (1) UPS’s corporate-wide “100% healed” policy; (2) UPS’s allegedly discriminatory implementation of its formal ADA compliance policy; or (3) the allegedly discriminatory use by UPS of uniform pretextual job descriptions.