Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
UPS LATEST PROPOSAL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Non liberal" data-source="post: 5637607" data-attributes="member: 94513"><p>SOME, do u see the word SOME? I didn’t say it would take all the full timers away. I said some. It’s kind of simple really. The closer PT pay gets to FT pay, the easier it becomes for someone to take the PT gig. Because it sucks working for these <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2 :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" />s. Do u understand yet? Not worried about anyone not being full time untill they take up the FT negotiating space. Then it down right pisses me off! If you want FT top rate, then go FT. Otherwise stop groveling.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Non liberal, post: 5637607, member: 94513"] SOME, do u see the word SOME? I didn’t say it would take all the full timers away. I said some. It’s kind of simple really. The closer PT pay gets to FT pay, the easier it becomes for someone to take the PT gig. Because it sucks working for these :censored:s. Do u understand yet? Not worried about anyone not being full time untill they take up the FT negotiating space. Then it down right pisses me off! If you want FT top rate, then go FT. Otherwise stop groveling. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
UPS LATEST PROPOSAL
Top
