Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
UPS on MSNBC last night?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="av8torntn" data-source="post: 333442" data-attributes="member: 8259"><p>From your article.</p><p> </p><p>"The gist of comparison presented here is correct."</p><p> </p><p>It goes on to say that it is over simplified in part because it assumes that you have no children and does not account for the AMT.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>There is an entire paragraph scolding the email author for not showing his work. </p><p> </p><p>The email says taxes are lower under Bush than Clinton, the snopes article says taxes are lower under Bush than Clinton, and you even admit taxes are lower under Bush than Clinton so you just seem upset that they did not apply the standard deduction to both years. Is that correct?</p><p> </p><p>When I said the article says the email got the answer basically right to me question was did Bush just cut taxes only for the rich. </p><p> </p><p>This is for the other article you posted.</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://democrats.senate.gov/members/" target="_blank">http://democrats.senate.gov/members/</a></p><p> </p><p>Seems the Democrats claim both Senators that were mentioned in the article are members of their caucus. If this is true as the Dem's claim then they would indeed have control of the Senate. This would not be a evenly divided Senate. This gives the Democrats all kinds of powers with rules and committees.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="av8torntn, post: 333442, member: 8259"] From your article. "The gist of comparison presented here is correct." It goes on to say that it is over simplified in part because it assumes that you have no children and does not account for the AMT. There is an entire paragraph scolding the email author for not showing his work. The email says taxes are lower under Bush than Clinton, the snopes article says taxes are lower under Bush than Clinton, and you even admit taxes are lower under Bush than Clinton so you just seem upset that they did not apply the standard deduction to both years. Is that correct? When I said the article says the email got the answer basically right to me question was did Bush just cut taxes only for the rich. This is for the other article you posted. [URL]http://democrats.senate.gov/members/[/URL] Seems the Democrats claim both Senators that were mentioned in the article are members of their caucus. If this is true as the Dem's claim then they would indeed have control of the Senate. This would not be a evenly divided Senate. This gives the Democrats all kinds of powers with rules and committees. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
UPS on MSNBC last night?
Top