Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
UPS Targeting Teamsters' Rights on Social Media
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BMWMC" data-source="post: 1256163" data-attributes="member: 37461"><p>First off I suppose if your an ass-clown and assume everyone live's and breaths BC and trolls every thread then you can say I missed that thread. However freedom of speech as the NRLB has defined it DOES protect employees. So Mr. Hoaxster if I want to wear a pickle barrel and walk a circle line in front of a store complaining about the service it A PROTECT ACT!!!!~!!</p><p>Free of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, are in the 1st amendment because it was <em>ITEM 1 for the importance of the constitution and bill of rights. NOW, </em>because people on this board have a pension for being PISS-POTS let me clarify: that the 1st amendments protects LEGALLY DEFINED speech. There feel smarter now? I took more than 1 class in college on constitutional law so excuse my not having your lengthy resume on the subject. Furthermore: the bases of the NRLB law. regulation, and rule is BASED ON THE 1ST AMENDMENT!!!!!! All they did is EXTEND the rights ALL citizens have to EXPRESS themselves AS DEFINED by the and court precedents.</p><p></p><p>According to the National Labor Board, Social Media are essentially digital water coolers. Acting General Counsel Lafe Solomon expounded, “This is a fairly straightforward case under the National Labor Relations Act — whether it takes place on Facebook or at the water cooler, it was employees talking jointly about working conditions, in this case about their supervisor, and they have a right to do that.”</p><p></p><p>This landmark case will serve as precedent for the coming flood of cases to consume courts.</p><p></p><p>While common sense is uncommon, it seems that in this case, at least employees are covered even if judgment lapses. The National Labor Relations Act gives workers a federally protected right to form unions and it prohibits the punishment of workers for discussing working conditions or unionization.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20150323020822/http://www.briansolis.com/2010/11/the-first-ammendment-of-social-media-freedom-of-tweet/" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20150323020822/http://www.briansolis.com/2010/11/the-first-ammendment-of-social-media-freedom-of-tweet/</a></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><em>This significant move by the NLB triggered a “lawflash” by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, a law firm with a large labor and employment practice representing hundreds of companies, “Employers should review their Internet and social media policies to determine whether they are susceptible to an allegation that the policy would ‘reasonably tend to chill employees’ in the exercise of their rights to discuss wages, working conditions and unionization.”</em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em><em><span style="color: #0000ff">**In case you glossed over the above paragraph, it essentially says that your social media policy might open up the organization to potential complaints, suits, and liabilities.**</span></em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em><em><span style="color: #0000ff"></span></em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em><em><span style="color: #0000ff"></span></em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em><em></em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em><em>[media=wikipedia]First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution[/media]</em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Would there even be one song allowed to be distributed or one letter to the editor that did tweak someone sensibilities. Even to complain about a companies service or render an opinion of same company products or service could be stifled if freedom of speech didn't extend to private citizens to non-governmental bodies. How could even 1 book get published? The historical, legal, and social bases for freedom of speech lies within the heart of its interpretation. </em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em><em><em><strong><a href="http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/firstaminto.htm" target="_blank">http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/firstaminto.htm</a></strong></em></em></em></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BMWMC, post: 1256163, member: 37461"] First off I suppose if your an ass-clown and assume everyone live's and breaths BC and trolls every thread then you can say I missed that thread. However freedom of speech as the NRLB has defined it DOES protect employees. So Mr. Hoaxster if I want to wear a pickle barrel and walk a circle line in front of a store complaining about the service it A PROTECT ACT!!!!~!! Free of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, are in the 1st amendment because it was [I]ITEM 1 for the importance of the constitution and bill of rights. NOW, [/I]because people on this board have a pension for being PISS-POTS let me clarify: that the 1st amendments protects LEGALLY DEFINED speech. There feel smarter now? I took more than 1 class in college on constitutional law so excuse my not having your lengthy resume on the subject. Furthermore: the bases of the NRLB law. regulation, and rule is BASED ON THE 1ST AMENDMENT!!!!!! All they did is EXTEND the rights ALL citizens have to EXPRESS themselves AS DEFINED by the and court precedents. According to the National Labor Board, Social Media are essentially digital water coolers. Acting General Counsel Lafe Solomon expounded, “This is a fairly straightforward case under the National Labor Relations Act — whether it takes place on Facebook or at the water cooler, it was employees talking jointly about working conditions, in this case about their supervisor, and they have a right to do that.” This landmark case will serve as precedent for the coming flood of cases to consume courts. While common sense is uncommon, it seems that in this case, at least employees are covered even if judgment lapses. The National Labor Relations Act gives workers a federally protected right to form unions and it prohibits the punishment of workers for discussing working conditions or unionization. [URL]https://web.archive.org/web/20150323020822/http://www.briansolis.com/2010/11/the-first-ammendment-of-social-media-freedom-of-tweet/[/URL] [B][I]This significant move by the NLB triggered a “lawflash” by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, a law firm with a large labor and employment practice representing hundreds of companies, “Employers should review their Internet and social media policies to determine whether they are susceptible to an allegation that the policy would ‘reasonably tend to chill employees’ in the exercise of their rights to discuss wages, working conditions and unionization.” [I][COLOR=#0000ff]**In case you glossed over the above paragraph, it essentially says that your social media policy might open up the organization to potential complaints, suits, and liabilities.** [/COLOR] [media=wikipedia]First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution[/media][/I] Would there even be one song allowed to be distributed or one letter to the editor that did tweak someone sensibilities. Even to complain about a companies service or render an opinion of same company products or service could be stifled if freedom of speech didn't extend to private citizens to non-governmental bodies. How could even 1 book get published? The historical, legal, and social bases for freedom of speech lies within the heart of its interpretation. [I][I][B][URL]http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/firstaminto.htm[/URL][/B][/I][/I][/I][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
UPS Targeting Teamsters' Rights on Social Media
Top