Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tadpole" data-source="post: 4978945" data-attributes="member: 53369">The Children&#039;s Health Defense article I linked to yesterday argued/implied that the Comirnaty product does not yet have immunity against adverse reaction lawsuits. It appears that this is untrue. I do not understand why they chose to create a new name for what appears to be the exact same product, but only grant full approval to the new product labeling. Doesn&#039;t make sense to me yet.I came across something else today that I found very interesting. Today on &quot;The Highwire&quot; with Del Bigtree and Jeffery Jaxen, It was reported that in the FDA&#039;s full approval letter, it states that the data they used when determining how effective the vaccine is against Covid, was data before the delta variant was dominant, and the most recent data over the past several months wasn&#039;t even considered.&nbsp; It&#039;s like they just approved the vaccine for last year&#039;s Covid when we are now dealing with a different animal.Furthermore the approval document states it is currently unknown whether the vaccine is carcinogenic, because it smells to reality, causes pregnancy harm, or is transmitted through breastmilk. You&#039;d think they&#039;d want to do studies and get more information on these things before giving full approval, wouldn&#039;t you? Something smells off.Then again, we probably can&#039;t trust The Highwire. YouTube and Facebook banned them and that means that they must be antivax misinformation spreaders. What they found in the approval letter must be fake. &lt;/s&gt;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tadpole, post: 4978945, member: 53369"] The Children's Health Defense article I linked to yesterday argued/implied that the Comirnaty product does not yet have immunity against adverse reaction lawsuits. It appears that this is untrue. I do not understand why they chose to create a new name for what appears to be the exact same product, but only grant full approval to the new product labeling. Doesn't make sense to me yet. I came across something else today that I found very interesting. Today on "The Highwire" with Del Bigtree and Jeffery Jaxen, It was reported that in the FDA's full approval letter, it states that the data they used when determining how effective the vaccine is against Covid, was data before the delta variant was dominant, and the most recent data over the past several months wasn't even considered. It's like they just approved the vaccine for last year's Covid when we are now dealing with a different animal. Furthermore the approval document states it is currently unknown whether the vaccine is carcinogenic, because it smells to reality, causes pregnancy harm, or is transmitted through breastmilk. You'd think they'd want to do studies and get more information on these things before giving full approval, wouldn't you? Something smells off. Then again, we probably can't trust The Highwire. YouTube and Facebook banned them and that means that they must be antivax misinformation spreaders. What they found in the approval letter must be fake. </s> [/QUOTE]

Verification