Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Value evaluation of Fedex Route
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mutineer" data-source="post: 4136504" data-attributes="member: 69587"><p>Chronic staffing issues and profitability aside, if a person has an interest in contracting with XG, the above quote accurately sums up what should be an adequate deterrent.</p><p></p><p>Nothing at XG is static. Rules and compliance requirements are cooked up on a whim. And just as quickly changed or discarded altogether. But not until you have spent time, money and resources into complying with them. </p><p></p><p>The purpose of XG management is to create problems and errands for contractors to solve, and then blame the origins and existence of the problems on the contractor. There are legions of white-collar desk-jockeys devoted to this purpose.</p><p></p><p>It's a never ending goose-chase with everything a contractor has invested hanging in a balance. </p><p></p><p>Be wary of rural addresses, state parks, natural resource exploration fields, and outskirt areas in any service area that you are considering. It only takes a few of these addresses to cause you chronic logistics, and profitability problems.</p><p></p><p>I know this may sound strange. And other XG'ers may have had very different experiences than mine. But if you abide in making money in this game; be very wary of any military bases, government installations, or anything federal in a service area.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mutineer, post: 4136504, member: 69587"] Chronic staffing issues and profitability aside, if a person has an interest in contracting with XG, the above quote accurately sums up what should be an adequate deterrent. Nothing at XG is static. Rules and compliance requirements are cooked up on a whim. And just as quickly changed or discarded altogether. But not until you have spent time, money and resources into complying with them. The purpose of XG management is to create problems and errands for contractors to solve, and then blame the origins and existence of the problems on the contractor. There are legions of white-collar desk-jockeys devoted to this purpose. It's a never ending goose-chase with everything a contractor has invested hanging in a balance. Be wary of rural addresses, state parks, natural resource exploration fields, and outskirt areas in any service area that you are considering. It only takes a few of these addresses to cause you chronic logistics, and profitability problems. I know this may sound strange. And other XG'ers may have had very different experiences than mine. But if you abide in making money in this game; be very wary of any military bases, government installations, or anything federal in a service area. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Value evaluation of Fedex Route
Top