Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JustDeliverIt" data-source="post: 3702393" data-attributes="member: 68456">Here&#039;s what I want from a No vote that I will be sending in on the master.1. &quot;As long as work is available&quot; taken out. No reason 22.4 should be guaranteed to 40 hours and RPCD are not.2. I don&#039;t believe that the 22.4 language is going anywhere, but given that they will be working weekends (should be premium pay) and giving the flexibility to work inside or drive (should also be premium pay IMO), they should be paid the same as RPCD and same protections (9.5 language, ect).3. 70 hour work week protection. They can say all they want that 22.4 will help, cannot leave the call up to the company. Simple language where a 60 hours max per week, employees discretion to waive their right and work 70 if the employee chooses.4. Some sort of catch up raises for PTers. Even if they gave anyone with 1+ years a buck raise, maybe even .75. They deserve something.These are the major flaws as I see it. Until they change these things, I&#039;m not on board.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JustDeliverIt, post: 3702393, member: 68456"] Here's what I want from a No vote that I will be sending in on the master. 1. "As long as work is available" taken out. No reason 22.4 should be guaranteed to 40 hours and RPCD are not. 2. I don't believe that the 22.4 language is going anywhere, but given that they will be working weekends (should be premium pay) and giving the flexibility to work inside or drive (should also be premium pay IMO), they should be paid the same as RPCD and same protections (9.5 language, ect). 3. 70 hour work week protection. They can say all they want that 22.4 will help, cannot leave the call up to the company. Simple language where a 60 hours max per week, employees discretion to waive their right and work 70 if the employee chooses. 4. Some sort of catch up raises for PTers. Even if they gave anyone with 1+ years a buck raise, maybe even .75. They deserve something. These are the major flaws as I see it. Until they change these things, I'm not on board. [/QUOTE]

Verification