Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BigJamesBrown" data-source="post: 3744590" data-attributes="member: 72397">Feeder driver on Deck, I voted no for the national and no for the supplement. I&#039;ve only been here for 6 months or so and the progression is killing me and others like me. I hear some of the senior guy say it&#039;s not fair to the company or to the other guys that went through progression, and I don&#039;t think fairness is the case at all. It is fair because we have fulfilled or obligations under the old contract.We are no longer be holding to what UPS has done to us or for Us in the past. I ask senior senior guys at what point do you take credit for building the UPS house and make it better for the next guys coming in? The fact that these guys are defending UPS is Ludacris, when you consider that the practices are only making worse conditions for the workers that subjected to UPS&#039;s unfair treatment of its workers. I also believe that the 24.5 will only further divide the workers, also I do not believe that UPS is doing enough for its part-time workers in the form of hourly rate! All of these concessions and give me seem like just another path to the same old same old a downward spiral to the we can&#039;t take it anymore place, by then it will be too late. More money, better working conditions, stronger language on the Grievances, protecting the part-time worker and a greater capacity, and no 24.5</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BigJamesBrown, post: 3744590, member: 72397"] Feeder driver on Deck, I voted no for the national and no for the supplement. I've only been here for 6 months or so and the progression is killing me and others like me. I hear some of the senior guy say it's not fair to the company or to the other guys that went through progression, and I don't think fairness is the case at all. It is fair because we have fulfilled or obligations under the old contract. We are no longer be holding to what UPS has done to us or for Us in the past. I ask senior senior guys at what point do you take credit for building the UPS house and make it better for the next guys coming in? The fact that these guys are defending UPS is Ludacris, when you consider that the practices are only making worse conditions for the workers that subjected to UPS's unfair treatment of its workers. I also believe that the 24.5 will only further divide the workers, also I do not believe that UPS is doing enough for its part-time workers in the form of hourly rate! All of these concessions and give me seem like just another path to the same old same old a downward spiral to the we can't take it anymore place, by then it will be too late. More money, better working conditions, stronger language on the Grievances, protecting the part-time worker and a greater capacity, and no 24.5 [/QUOTE]

Verification