Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
*********** warning letters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 561556" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>Two of the most bullsh$% warning letters I have ever seen were issued last week on my center.</p><p> </p><p>One guy got a warning letter for "failure to maintain demonstrated performance". He is a good employee whose only crime was to get fuc$%ed over on his last "timestudy".</p><p> </p><p>He had 2 OJS rides that averaged out to 12.59 SPORH with good methods and good work pace <em>documented</em> by the supervisor. Those good methods and pace <em>still</em> caused him to be an hour overallowed.</p><p> </p><p>The following week, without supervision, he averaged 11.73 SPORH and was issued the warning letter....<u>over a difference of .86 SPORH</u>. This is a drop in SPORH of only 6.83% which is statistically insignificant and well within an expected range over a period of time. The company is looking for an overallowed hour that does not exist in the real world so rather than adressing the flawed study they write the guy up instead.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The second BS warning letter was for "failure to properly document personal time." </p><p> </p><p>This employee needed to use the restroom so he used his break time to drive to one. Using data collected via Telematics, it was determined that the elapsed amount of time taken <em>from the time he broke trace until the time he got back on trace</em> was 17.8 minutes rather than the 15 minutes he recorded in the DIAD. So, over a discrepancy of approximately 165 <em>seconds</em>, he was issued a warning letter.</p><p> </p><p>Remember how we were told that the primary function of Telematics was to "improve our safety" and "enhance vehicle maintainence"? What a load of bullsh%$. Telematics serves one purpose; giving desk-bound supervisors the ability to micromanage and harass employees without ever having to leave the comfort of an air-conditioned office.</p><p> </p><p>We have an entire generation of management people who are frightened for their jobs due to the loss in volume. Since they have nothing meaningful or relevant to do, they justify their own continued existence by generating reams of meaningless reports and warning letters to create the illusion of being important.</p><p> </p><p>Its not <em>what</em> you accomplish that gets you promoted in UPS management; its how good you look on paper <em>pretending</em> to accomplish it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 561556, member: 14668"] Two of the most bullsh$% warning letters I have ever seen were issued last week on my center. One guy got a warning letter for "failure to maintain demonstrated performance". He is a good employee whose only crime was to get fuc$%ed over on his last "timestudy". He had 2 OJS rides that averaged out to 12.59 SPORH with good methods and good work pace [I]documented[/I] by the supervisor. Those good methods and pace [I]still[/I] caused him to be an hour overallowed. The following week, without supervision, he averaged 11.73 SPORH and was issued the warning letter....[U]over a difference of .86 SPORH[/U]. This is a drop in SPORH of only 6.83% which is statistically insignificant and well within an expected range over a period of time. The company is looking for an overallowed hour that does not exist in the real world so rather than adressing the flawed study they write the guy up instead. The second BS warning letter was for "failure to properly document personal time." This employee needed to use the restroom so he used his break time to drive to one. Using data collected via Telematics, it was determined that the elapsed amount of time taken [I]from the time he broke trace until the time he got back on trace[/I] was 17.8 minutes rather than the 15 minutes he recorded in the DIAD. So, over a discrepancy of approximately 165 [I]seconds[/I], he was issued a warning letter. Remember how we were told that the primary function of Telematics was to "improve our safety" and "enhance vehicle maintainence"? What a load of bullsh%$. Telematics serves one purpose; giving desk-bound supervisors the ability to micromanage and harass employees without ever having to leave the comfort of an air-conditioned office. We have an entire generation of management people who are frightened for their jobs due to the loss in volume. Since they have nothing meaningful or relevant to do, they justify their own continued existence by generating reams of meaningless reports and warning letters to create the illusion of being important. Its not [I]what[/I] you accomplish that gets you promoted in UPS management; its how good you look on paper [I]pretending[/I] to accomplish it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
*********** warning letters
Top