Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
*********** warning letters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dannyboy" data-source="post: 563142" data-attributes="member: 484"><p>Both you managers have echoed Sober. That you can only use Sporh when it comes to discipline, which is not what I am trying to get across.</p><p> </p><p>When it comes to the over all picture of the work day, the timed study gives a better consistent snapshot of the actual day the driver had. IT takes into account all the variables that the Sporh (which it was meant to replace) was not able to factor in. If it were not so, UPS would have never spent the money to implement it. </p><p> </p><p>So the whole argument about dropping Sporh numbers while the over allowed numbers stayed the same tells me that the driver was doing the same job before, during and after the OJS ride. And as such, management should not have any valid reason to be in this drivers case.</p><p> </p><p>Pman, and yes, 6% increase in labor costs is something that is very costly. If it were actually so. There are too many other factors that could have contributed to that decrease.</p><p> </p><p>d</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dannyboy, post: 563142, member: 484"] Both you managers have echoed Sober. That you can only use Sporh when it comes to discipline, which is not what I am trying to get across. When it comes to the over all picture of the work day, the timed study gives a better consistent snapshot of the actual day the driver had. IT takes into account all the variables that the Sporh (which it was meant to replace) was not able to factor in. If it were not so, UPS would have never spent the money to implement it. So the whole argument about dropping Sporh numbers while the over allowed numbers stayed the same tells me that the driver was doing the same job before, during and after the OJS ride. And as such, management should not have any valid reason to be in this drivers case. Pman, and yes, 6% increase in labor costs is something that is very costly. If it were actually so. There are too many other factors that could have contributed to that decrease. d [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
*********** warning letters
Top