Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
What are the chances
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="&#039;Lord Brown&#039;s bidding&#039;" data-source="post: 2010321" data-attributes="member: 32753"><p>How has a driver <em>defrauded</em> UPS by rolling packages; that word means he has profited in some way at UPS' expense; same thing with the customer. It's not just about damaging the customer or UPS, but <em>profit to the driver</em> has to be there; otherwise, it should be "failure to follow methods and procedures". I've always felt it was a genius move on the bargaining committee's part getting that word "defraud" in there; shoot, even changing the time clock shouldn't be anything, outside of a bonus center.</p><p></p><p>As for progressive discipline, you say first offense <em>could</em> be a warning letter; it cannot go past that right, legally? So if a manager is like, "What?! You rolled a pacakge?! YOU'RE GONE!", it should be as simple as saying, "Noooo, he hasn't been disciplined for this before[in the last nine months, since records no longer count against you after that time, and your 'sin clock' resets]; the most he can get is a warning letter." There is a disagreement, which means for the time being the employee should work under article 7, right?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="'Lord Brown's bidding', post: 2010321, member: 32753"] How has a driver [I]defrauded[/I] UPS by rolling packages; that word means he has profited in some way at UPS' expense; same thing with the customer. It's not just about damaging the customer or UPS, but [I]profit to the driver[/I] has to be there; otherwise, it should be "failure to follow methods and procedures". I've always felt it was a genius move on the bargaining committee's part getting that word "defraud" in there; shoot, even changing the time clock shouldn't be anything, outside of a bonus center. As for progressive discipline, you say first offense [I]could[/I] be a warning letter; it cannot go past that right, legally? So if a manager is like, "What?! You rolled a pacakge?! YOU'RE GONE!", it should be as simple as saying, "Noooo, he hasn't been disciplined for this before[in the last nine months, since records no longer count against you after that time, and your 'sin clock' resets]; the most he can get is a warning letter." There is a disagreement, which means for the time being the employee should work under article 7, right? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
What are the chances
Top