Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
What happened to all the DOUBLE DIP predictions by the C9 and the right wing??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="moreluck" data-source="post: 929745" data-attributes="member: 1246"><p>You're the one that's being ignorant........Kodak was in on it early, not "way behind" as you said.</p><p></p><p>"Kodak did comprehend that digital photography was going to be huge. It jumped on the digital-camera bandwagon early. It was one of the top-selling brands in the late 1990s and early this century, when consumers first started to replace their 35mm point-and-shoots with digital models. In a market dominated by Canon, Nikon, Sony and other Japanese brands, it was the only U.S. camera company that managed any real success at all. (HP made digital cameras for a time, but exited the business in 2007.)"</p><p></p><p></p><p>I said they didn't run with it, but they had the technology early.</p><p></p><p>I never said Buck had anything to do with Kodak....I compared Buck's way of leading to the Kodak's head in not picking up the ball and running with it. Pay attention.....there's no reading stuff into the words that are written. (Maybe you should read post#11 again)</p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-33200_3-57362508-290/kodak-was-never-going-to-be-the-kodak-of-digital-photography/?part=rss&subj=latest-news&tag=title" target="_blank">Kodak was never going to be the Kodak of digital photography | Challengers - CNET News</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="moreluck, post: 929745, member: 1246"] You're the one that's being ignorant........Kodak was in on it early, not "way behind" as you said. "Kodak did comprehend that digital photography was going to be huge. It jumped on the digital-camera bandwagon early. It was one of the top-selling brands in the late 1990s and early this century, when consumers first started to replace their 35mm point-and-shoots with digital models. In a market dominated by Canon, Nikon, Sony and other Japanese brands, it was the only U.S. camera company that managed any real success at all. (HP made digital cameras for a time, but exited the business in 2007.)" I said they didn't run with it, but they had the technology early. I never said Buck had anything to do with Kodak....I compared Buck's way of leading to the Kodak's head in not picking up the ball and running with it. Pay attention.....there's no reading stuff into the words that are written. (Maybe you should read post#11 again) [URL="http://news.cnet.com/8301-33200_3-57362508-290/kodak-was-never-going-to-be-the-kodak-of-digital-photography/?part=rss&subj=latest-news&tag=title"]Kodak was never going to be the Kodak of digital photography | Challengers - CNET News[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
What happened to all the DOUBLE DIP predictions by the C9 and the right wing??
Top