Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
What is L.P. thinking?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dannyboy" data-source="post: 412156" data-attributes="member: 484"><p>cach</p><p> </p><p>so you are implying that the union condones covering up theft and the protection of thieves? that is what it sounds like.</p><p> </p><p>tie</p><p> </p><p>being stupid is not against the law. the act of registering the phone with security is exactly what one would do if they indeed believed the phone was a legit purchase. as for the da and the part ups is playing in this action, ups gave the da information. ups says we have proof of this guy stealing the phone. the da takes ups at its word and do their job.</p><p> </p><p>the jury of his peers (the panel) has found the guy not guilty of theft. stupidity, fur sure, but he was not fired because of stupidity, was he. and the powers that be in lp could have fired him for possession of goods stolen from ups, but that was not the charge either.</p><p> </p><p>lp put all their eggs in the felony theft charge at the panel, and the preponderance of the evidence did not support a guilty ruling by the panel. </p><p> </p><p>remember, you have to show the guy is guilty, not just claim he is per your view.</p><p> </p><p>the panel said he is not guilty (innocent for those of you that are learning challenged) of the charge of theft....... lets see what a court of law says.</p><p> </p><p>d</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dannyboy, post: 412156, member: 484"] cach so you are implying that the union condones covering up theft and the protection of thieves? that is what it sounds like. tie being stupid is not against the law. the act of registering the phone with security is exactly what one would do if they indeed believed the phone was a legit purchase. as for the da and the part ups is playing in this action, ups gave the da information. ups says we have proof of this guy stealing the phone. the da takes ups at its word and do their job. the jury of his peers (the panel) has found the guy not guilty of theft. stupidity, fur sure, but he was not fired because of stupidity, was he. and the powers that be in lp could have fired him for possession of goods stolen from ups, but that was not the charge either. lp put all their eggs in the felony theft charge at the panel, and the preponderance of the evidence did not support a guilty ruling by the panel. remember, you have to show the guy is guilty, not just claim he is per your view. the panel said he is not guilty (innocent for those of you that are learning challenged) of the charge of theft....... lets see what a court of law says. d [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
What is L.P. thinking?
Top