Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
What is L.P. thinking?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dannyboy" data-source="post: 412783" data-attributes="member: 484"><p>ok 9.5, you talked me into it, but only one more post as tie is getting a bit red around the collar<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" /></p><p> </p><p> assumptions. there is knowing it is hit, or not knowing. i happen to think that he didnt know. and i suspect that is what got shown at the panel hearing, because managment would never have brought back an employee that either stole the phone, or in any way had any knowledge that it was stolen. sorry tie, been to too many panel hearings to believe that the ba pulled one on the management portion of the panel. and i also can not see, for all the bad rap union ba's have, of them condoning a thief as well.</p><p> </p><p> i dont recall he ever claimed he was a fence. a fence is a thief, without question. but you are putting words in the guys mouth.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>and now we have a contrast, first you state that he knew how to activate the phone, then state the obvious, he bought a sim card and got a plan the normal way.</p><p> </p><p>speaking of plans, they still cost from free to $149 with a plan, so not only was he stupid for buying a used phone in a parking lot for more than what it was worth, but he got took on the deal as well, not to mention that the phone was hot too!</p><p> </p><p>one last thing, then done with this thread.</p><p> </p><p>tie, everyone that is disagreeing with you is doing so on the inocent until proven guilty phenomina, something that a lot of people around the world dont understand. if guilty, the kid needs to pay the price. if innocent, ups needs to do the same.</p><p> </p><p>until then, innocent man keeps job until it is shown he is guilty. and those that do disagree with you also dont support or condone thieves. but we also dont jump to conclusions that are faulty.</p><p> </p><p>9.5, nope, if he came to my home, i would not watch him behind his back.</p><p> </p><p>d</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dannyboy, post: 412783, member: 484"] ok 9.5, you talked me into it, but only one more post as tie is getting a bit red around the collar:wink2: assumptions. there is knowing it is hit, or not knowing. i happen to think that he didnt know. and i suspect that is what got shown at the panel hearing, because managment would never have brought back an employee that either stole the phone, or in any way had any knowledge that it was stolen. sorry tie, been to too many panel hearings to believe that the ba pulled one on the management portion of the panel. and i also can not see, for all the bad rap union ba's have, of them condoning a thief as well. i dont recall he ever claimed he was a fence. a fence is a thief, without question. but you are putting words in the guys mouth. and now we have a contrast, first you state that he knew how to activate the phone, then state the obvious, he bought a sim card and got a plan the normal way. speaking of plans, they still cost from free to $149 with a plan, so not only was he stupid for buying a used phone in a parking lot for more than what it was worth, but he got took on the deal as well, not to mention that the phone was hot too! one last thing, then done with this thread. tie, everyone that is disagreeing with you is doing so on the inocent until proven guilty phenomina, something that a lot of people around the world dont understand. if guilty, the kid needs to pay the price. if innocent, ups needs to do the same. until then, innocent man keeps job until it is shown he is guilty. and those that do disagree with you also dont support or condone thieves. but we also dont jump to conclusions that are faulty. 9.5, nope, if he came to my home, i would not watch him behind his back. d [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
What is L.P. thinking?
Top