wkmac
Well-Known Member
We always ignore the crazies in our own backyard.
In December 1980' the British House of Commons held debate on the situation in the Falklands and during the debate Mr. Julian Amery (Brighton, Pavilion) made a somewhat interesting observation in the context of looking back 30 years later.
When we consider what is known now about the Falklands, one is prone to ask what might have been known then to push Mad Maggie to threaten such ultimate extremes against another European "declining" Neo-Colonial power. And also thus again, we find in the background of a major military conflict, the presence of oil!
In December 1980' the British House of Commons held debate on the situation in the Falklands and during the debate Mr. Julian Amery (Brighton, Pavilion) made a somewhat interesting observation in the context of looking back 30 years later.
Mr Julian Amery (Brighton, Pavilion)
Is my Honourable Friend aware that his statement is profoundly disturbing? Is he also aware, certainly the Falkland Islanders are, that for years - and here I speak from some experience - his Department has wanted to get rid of this commitment? Is he further aware that it is almost always a great mistake to get rid of real estate for nothing, that the Falkland Islands may have an important part to play in the future of the South Atlantic and that admitting that the interests of the inhabitants and their wishes must be paramount, there is also a considerable British interest in maintaining this commitment, which is probably much cheaper to maintain than it is to lose? Will my Honourable Friend look back at the cost to us in terms of oil prices of the surrender of Aden and the Persian Gulf?
When we consider what is known now about the Falklands, one is prone to ask what might have been known then to push Mad Maggie to threaten such ultimate extremes against another European "declining" Neo-Colonial power. And also thus again, we find in the background of a major military conflict, the presence of oil!