Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Who is Obama
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tieguy" data-source="post: 363060" data-attributes="member: 1912"><p>Originally Posted by <strong>tieguy</strong></p><p></p><p><em><span style="color: black">If experts are not considering we are in a recession NOW, how can you make a statement suggesting Clinton had left office in the same sorry state of a "tanking" economic condition as Bush will leave it before he high-tails it back to Texas to his lil' red pick-up truck.</span></em></p><p></p><p><em><span style="color: blue">Not sure your point. Everyone knows the economy is presently tanking not sure how that point disagrees with what I said about clintons economy?</span></em></p><p></p><p><em><span style="color: black">B4 you use the Dem congress excuse, keep in mind Clinton had a cut throat, back stabbing Rep Congress also hellbent on putting a Republican back in the Whitehouse as well.</span></em></p><p></p><p><em><span style="color: blue">that congress deserves some of the credit or blame for conditions then, this congress deserves the same for conditions now. I think you're smart enough , where I should not have to explain that point to you?</span></em></p><p></p><p></p><p><em><span style="color: black">Bill and his Executive Branch adhere's to the Constitution, but was laugh at by the Rep' Congress prior to 9/11 to go after Bin Laden. </span></em></p><p></p><p><em><span style="color: blue">huh? The truth is stretching here. Bill had plenty of reasons to declare a war on terrorism and congress would not have been able to stop him since he has broad powers to take military action.</span></em></p><p></p><p><em><span style="color: black">Bill may have cut wasteful, excessive military spending, but he left office with approving some of the most high tech sophisticated weapontry on the planet. In fact, this is Bush's war, but Clintons arsenal.</span></em></p><p></p><p><em><span style="color: blue">If thats your point then you're blaming clinton for not having armor plating on our vehicles , this after we had opportunitys to see the need during somalia and clintons own skirmishes?</span></em></p><p></p><p><em><span style="color: black">Many of these weapons are designed to put very limited troops on the ground. Fine tuning military equipment with ground troops for invading and occupying other countries could of been achieved by the current war mongering administration.</span></em></p><p></p><p><em><span style="color: blue">Honestly many of these weapons were being designed and approved prior to Clinton. </span></em></p><p></p><p><em>Wasn't it the Rep Congress and Ken Starr that made Monica-gate a major distraction....you know back in the day, old school politicians and surragates would never rat-out their president for banging willing interns</em></p><p></p><p><em><span style="color: blue">You keep talking about Clinton and monica. I'm talking about a consistent pattern of what was more then monica. Don't forget all the sexual harrassment cases he dodged. Flashing his johnson at ms jones should have cost him his job. </span></em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tieguy, post: 363060, member: 1912"] Originally Posted by [B]tieguy[/B] [I][COLOR=black]If experts are not considering we are in a recession NOW, how can you make a statement suggesting Clinton had left office in the same sorry state of a "tanking" economic condition as Bush will leave it before he high-tails it back to Texas to his lil' red pick-up truck.[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=blue]Not sure your point. Everyone knows the economy is presently tanking not sure how that point disagrees with what I said about clintons economy?[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=black]B4 you use the Dem congress excuse, keep in mind Clinton had a cut throat, back stabbing Rep Congress also hellbent on putting a Republican back in the Whitehouse as well.[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=blue]that congress deserves some of the credit or blame for conditions then, this congress deserves the same for conditions now. I think you're smart enough , where I should not have to explain that point to you?[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=black]Bill and his Executive Branch adhere's to the Constitution, but was laugh at by the Rep' Congress prior to 9/11 to go after Bin Laden. [/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=blue]huh? The truth is stretching here. Bill had plenty of reasons to declare a war on terrorism and congress would not have been able to stop him since he has broad powers to take military action.[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=black]Bill may have cut wasteful, excessive military spending, but he left office with approving some of the most high tech sophisticated weapontry on the planet. In fact, this is Bush's war, but Clintons arsenal.[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=blue]If thats your point then you're blaming clinton for not having armor plating on our vehicles , this after we had opportunitys to see the need during somalia and clintons own skirmishes?[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=black]Many of these weapons are designed to put very limited troops on the ground. Fine tuning military equipment with ground troops for invading and occupying other countries could of been achieved by the current war mongering administration.[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=blue]Honestly many of these weapons were being designed and approved prior to Clinton. [/COLOR][/I] [I]Wasn't it the Rep Congress and Ken Starr that made Monica-gate a major distraction....you know back in the day, old school politicians and surragates would never rat-out their president for banging willing interns[/I] [I][COLOR=blue]You keep talking about Clinton and monica. I'm talking about a consistent pattern of what was more then monica. Don't forget all the sexual harrassment cases he dodged. Flashing his johnson at ms jones should have cost him his job. [/COLOR][/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Who is Obama
Top