Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Who, What, Why- The Weatherman??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="av8torntn" data-source="post: 335527" data-attributes="member: 8259"><p>A toned down version of the above post. </p><p> </p><p>You either did not read the report or English is not your primary language.</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/LCplTatum/IO_REPORT_LCPL_TATUM_32.pdf" target="_blank">http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/LCplTatum/IO_REPORT_LCPL_TATUM_32.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p>"I recommend withdrawal and dismissal of all charges."</p><p> </p><p>"To be clear I am not recommending that charges go forward."</p><p> </p><p>"They are not accurate translations of what the witness said."</p><p> </p><p><strong>"The evidence presented demonstrates that Tatum followed the rules of engagement."</strong></p><p> </p><p>"Evidence offered fails to support reasonable grounds for charges"</p><p> </p><p>"Marines are educated and trained on the limits to kill under the rules of engagement."</p><p> </p><p>"Marines observed incoming fire from house 1."</p><p> </p><p>"If you receive fire from a building that building and its occupants are declared as hostile."</p><p> </p><p>"The government knew this account prior to granting immunity, arguably after concluding his actions were in accord with the rules of engagement."</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>While you are looking for that proof you had of those Army snipers that were convicted of murder for baiting targets in Iraq I thought maybe you could explain how the above is taken out of context. I am starting to think you and Time are both just as gullible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="av8torntn, post: 335527, member: 8259"] A toned down version of the above post. You either did not read the report or English is not your primary language. [URL]http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/LCplTatum/IO_REPORT_LCPL_TATUM_32.pdf[/URL] "I recommend withdrawal and dismissal of all charges." "To be clear I am not recommending that charges go forward." "They are not accurate translations of what the witness said." [B]"The evidence presented demonstrates that Tatum followed the rules of engagement."[/B] "Evidence offered fails to support reasonable grounds for charges" "Marines are educated and trained on the limits to kill under the rules of engagement." "Marines observed incoming fire from house 1." "If you receive fire from a building that building and its occupants are declared as hostile." "The government knew this account prior to granting immunity, arguably after concluding his actions were in accord with the rules of engagement." While you are looking for that proof you had of those Army snipers that were convicted of murder for baiting targets in Iraq I thought maybe you could explain how the above is taken out of context. I am starting to think you and Time are both just as gullible. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Who, What, Why- The Weatherman??
Top