Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Why are transfers not a language in these new contracts?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="1package2go" data-source="post: 3656021" data-attributes="member: 73588"><p>I see and hear allot of transfer questions from employees. The transfer policy is in need of a change. Why is this never a topic in new contracts? Keeping seniority with transfer! I understand it may seem unfair for a person with less seniority waiting for a position at their building when another transfer employee with more tenure moves right in front of them may seem unfair but seniority is seniority. Building and company should be the same thing. Does this make sense to anyone.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="1package2go, post: 3656021, member: 73588"] I see and hear allot of transfer questions from employees. The transfer policy is in need of a change. Why is this never a topic in new contracts? Keeping seniority with transfer! I understand it may seem unfair for a person with less seniority waiting for a position at their building when another transfer employee with more tenure moves right in front of them may seem unfair but seniority is seniority. Building and company should be the same thing. Does this make sense to anyone. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Why are transfers not a language in these new contracts?
Top