Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="refineryworker05" data-source="post: 2908194" data-attributes="member: 66082">What you post about the ACA and dependency makes no sense.What you posted about poor people and voting makes no sense given that poor people vote the least of any group, pay attention to politicians the least of any group, and have the least actual influence over policy and also given the fact that helping certain groups of poor Americans greatly angers and upsets a lot of bigots who don&#039;t want them to be helped and who blame the Democratic party and vote against the Democratic party for that reason.&nbsp; These are all objective facts.And if poor people were so dependent on the government that they believed their way of life depended on it, they should be the most engaged voters, the most active voters, the most passionate voters, the most frequent voters and the most influential voters, but in the real world the exact opposite is true.In fact, the most influential voters are the wealthy and the old, the most passionate voters that hard to say, but the most frequent voters are the wealthy and the old.&nbsp; The most engaged voters are again the wealthy and the old.Those two groups behave like they believe their way of life depends on the government and both groups greatly depend on the government.So what is true that in order to justify bigoted beliefs towards poor people, conservatives portray them as this huge voting block of immoral, lazy, criminal takers that the Democratic party uses illegally to swing elections to take hardworking Americans money.&nbsp; lolThis is fiction and prejudice.So yeah, you have nothing to offer on this subject but the same conservative boiler plate of prejudice and dishonesty.&nbsp; I am done with this topic.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="refineryworker05, post: 2908194, member: 66082"] What you post about the ACA and dependency makes no sense. What you posted about poor people and voting makes no sense given that poor people vote the least of any group, pay attention to politicians the least of any group, and have the least actual influence over policy and also given the fact that helping certain groups of poor Americans greatly angers and upsets a lot of bigots who don't want them to be helped and who blame the Democratic party and vote against the Democratic party for that reason. These are all objective facts. And if poor people were so dependent on the government that they believed their way of life depended on it, they should be the most engaged voters, the most active voters, the most passionate voters, the most frequent voters and the most influential voters, but in the real world the exact opposite is true. In fact, the most influential voters are the wealthy and the old, the most passionate voters that hard to say, but the most frequent voters are the wealthy and the old. The most engaged voters are again the wealthy and the old. Those two groups behave like they believe their way of life depends on the government and both groups greatly depend on the government. So what is true that in order to justify bigoted beliefs towards poor people, conservatives portray them as this huge voting block of immoral, lazy, criminal takers that the Democratic party uses illegally to swing elections to take hardworking Americans money. lol This is fiction and prejudice. So yeah, you have nothing to offer on this subject but the same conservative boiler plate of prejudice and dishonesty. I am done with this topic. [/QUOTE]

Verification