Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Why vote?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="diesel96" data-source="post: 781444" data-attributes="member: 9859"><p>Here ye ! here ye ! Come one Come all....Introdrucing "The Weeper of the House" John Boehner ! Crying us a river of tears like "The Beckster" in Mandy Pandy Land.....lol</p><p>(In Conservative women language) "Man up", "Pull up your man pants" Mr Boehner, and take some composure lessons from bleeding heart liberal Mrs Pelosi.....And Mrs Pelosi, please leave a case of tissue boxes as your parting gift....</p><p></p><p><a href="http://theamericanpeopleslobby.com/wordpress/man-up-put-your-man-pants-on-and-stop-crying-john-boner-er-boehner" target="_blank">http://theamericanpeopleslobby.com/wordpress/man-up-put-your-man-pants-on-and-stop-crying-john-boner-er-boehner</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You guys are so gullible, it's comical... <a href="http://factcheck.org/2010/11/ask-factcheck-trip-to-mumbai/" target="_blank">http://factcheck.org/2010/11/ask-factcheck-trip-to-mumbai/</a></p><p></p><p>"This story has spread rapidly among the president’s critics, but there is simply no evidence to support it. And common sense should lead anyone to doubt it. For example, the entire U.S. war effort in Afghanistan currently costs less than that — about $5.7 billion per month, <a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL33110.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="color: #255a8e">according to the Congressional Research Service</span></a>, or roughly $190 million per day. How could a peaceful state visit cost more than a war?"</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hate to annoy Teabag people with facts such as this. Everyone knows facts have a liberal bias...lol</p><p>What it means is that with all this historic accomplishments of the last 21 months, and giving 98% of America tax cuts, they also shrunk the deficit, unlike the Bush Administration. We carried on a war started by the republicans. Used measures similar to those used effectively by FDR to end the depression.</p><p>I've said it before and I'll say it again....as most educated economist agree, the government NEEDED direct spending during a super recession like this to prevent it from turning into a full blown depression. Hence the extreme budget picture. That means some temporary deficits will be a reality until the Republican Recession fully resides.</p><p>That said, this administration and this congress has been going to great lengths to try to put the country back on track for long term investment and fiscal responsibility without Republicans lifting a finger.</p><p></p><p>I know it's complicated but the deficit is based not only on how much money goes out, but also how much comes back in.</p><p>"Current laws and policies remain unchanged"... Imagined a budget savings sometime between 2011 and 2020 without Wars/reduction of Defense spending and Tax cuts for the rich expiring...</p><p>The GOP has a particular narrative that they've pounded us with for this election. Despite the fact that small business got its first TAX CUT this year under Obama and despite the fact that the US deficit is lower this year than last, the GOP has already SEALED THE DEAL. Their narrative is already in place.</p><p>If I remember correctly,Dick Cheney said deficits don't matter. He then brandished his Dr Evil smiled broadly, proud of his statement,and Bush agreed. What was meant by "deficits don't matter" was that they don't matter for Republican voters when voting for Republican candidates, and that has historically be shown to be true. How's that reply for you Brownie, BTW, you did one heck of a job during Katrina......;-)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="diesel96, post: 781444, member: 9859"] Here ye ! here ye ! Come one Come all....Introdrucing "The Weeper of the House" John Boehner ! Crying us a river of tears like "The Beckster" in Mandy Pandy Land.....lol (In Conservative women language) "Man up", "Pull up your man pants" Mr Boehner, and take some composure lessons from bleeding heart liberal Mrs Pelosi.....And Mrs Pelosi, please leave a case of tissue boxes as your parting gift.... [url]http://theamericanpeopleslobby.com/wordpress/man-up-put-your-man-pants-on-and-stop-crying-john-boner-er-boehner[/url] You guys are so gullible, it's comical... [url]http://factcheck.org/2010/11/ask-factcheck-trip-to-mumbai/[/url] "This story has spread rapidly among the president’s critics, but there is simply no evidence to support it. And common sense should lead anyone to doubt it. For example, the entire U.S. war effort in Afghanistan currently costs less than that — about $5.7 billion per month, [URL='http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL33110.pdf'][COLOR=#255a8e]according to the Congressional Research Service[/COLOR][/URL], or roughly $190 million per day. How could a peaceful state visit cost more than a war?" Hate to annoy Teabag people with facts such as this. Everyone knows facts have a liberal bias...lol What it means is that with all this historic accomplishments of the last 21 months, and giving 98% of America tax cuts, they also shrunk the deficit, unlike the Bush Administration. We carried on a war started by the republicans. Used measures similar to those used effectively by FDR to end the depression. I've said it before and I'll say it again....as most educated economist agree, the government NEEDED direct spending during a super recession like this to prevent it from turning into a full blown depression. Hence the extreme budget picture. That means some temporary deficits will be a reality until the Republican Recession fully resides. That said, this administration and this congress has been going to great lengths to try to put the country back on track for long term investment and fiscal responsibility without Republicans lifting a finger. I know it's complicated but the deficit is based not only on how much money goes out, but also how much comes back in. "Current laws and policies remain unchanged"... Imagined a budget savings sometime between 2011 and 2020 without Wars/reduction of Defense spending and Tax cuts for the rich expiring... The GOP has a particular narrative that they've pounded us with for this election. Despite the fact that small business got its first TAX CUT this year under Obama and despite the fact that the US deficit is lower this year than last, the GOP has already SEALED THE DEAL. Their narrative is already in place. If I remember correctly,Dick Cheney said deficits don't matter. He then brandished his Dr Evil smiled broadly, proud of his statement,and Bush agreed. What was meant by "deficits don't matter" was that they don't matter for Republican voters when voting for Republican candidates, and that has historically be shown to be true. How's that reply for you Brownie, BTW, you did one heck of a job during Katrina......;-) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Why vote?
Top