Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
WMDs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="susiedriver" data-source="post: 95251" data-attributes="member: 1848"><p><strong>Re: Phony WMDs</strong></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Okay, let’s try to dissect the truth from the bullcrap.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Santorum said: "Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px">So we are able to discern from Santorum’s statement that about 500 shells containing ‘degraded’ chemicals that pre-date 1991 have been discovered. These were not ‘WMDs’ despite dBoys definition. These were (15 years ago) tactical battlefield munitions. Not a good thing, but not a WMD. These were unusable shells that were not destroyed after the Gulf War. They are not WMDs, they are not evidence that Saddam was pursuing a weapons program after 1991. This was all addressed in The Duelfer Report, and Dear Leader commented on that over a year and a half ago: </span></span><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A14897-2004Oct7?language=printer" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #0000ff">http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A14897-2004Oct7?language=printer</span></span></span></a></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px">The reason no one besides Fox is reporting on this is Santorum (R- Homophobe) is full of crap. This was not the reason we invaded Iraq, there are no WMDs there, in spite of dBoys statement of ‘those of us that knew they were there’.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Oh, dBoy, I don’t think WMDs were the reason for the war in Bosnia, either.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px">One more thing, I hate Bush.</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="susiedriver, post: 95251, member: 1848"] [b]Re: Phony WMDs[/b] [FONT=Arial][SIZE=3]Okay, let’s try to dissect the truth from the bullcrap.[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Arial][SIZE=3]Santorum said: "Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Arial][SIZE=3]So we are able to discern from Santorum’s statement that about 500 shells containing ‘degraded’ chemicals that pre-date 1991 have been discovered. These were not ‘WMDs’ despite dBoys definition. These were (15 years ago) tactical battlefield munitions. Not a good thing, but not a WMD. These were unusable shells that were not destroyed after the Gulf War. They are not WMDs, they are not evidence that Saddam was pursuing a weapons program after 1991. This was all addressed in The Duelfer Report, and Dear Leader commented on that over a year and a half ago: [/SIZE][/FONT][URL="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A14897-2004Oct7?language=printer"][FONT=Arial][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A14897-2004Oct7?language=printer[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/URL] [FONT=Arial][SIZE=3]The reason no one besides Fox is reporting on this is Santorum (R- Homophobe) is full of crap. This was not the reason we invaded Iraq, there are no WMDs there, in spite of dBoys statement of ‘those of us that knew they were there’.[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Arial][SIZE=3]Oh, dBoy, I don’t think WMDs were the reason for the war in Bosnia, either.[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Arial][SIZE=3]One more thing, I hate Bush.[/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
WMDs
Top