Yesterday 9/8/2022 FBI raided homes of Trump allies

floridays

Well-Known Member
The FBI has declined to comment on a report released by Steve Bannon. According to Bannon, the FBI raided the homes of at least 35 Trump allies. He broke this news on Charlie Kirk’s show.
 

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
306076522_5851308704882308_3607399130090644985_n.jpg
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Wasn't Tucker Carlson the one who's lawyers said his show was strictly for entertainment purposes and no one shoud be expected to take it seriously? Asking for a friend
So you're saying no facts are ever given on Tucker's show? Just because a strategy was used to get out of a bogus lawsuit? Okayyyyy.....:backingout:
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
Wasn't Tucker Carlson the one who's lawyers said his show was strictly for entertainment purposes and no one shoud be expected to take it seriously? Asking for a friend
No. Fox News' lawyers cited precedent from a case where MSNBC lawyers argued that. Then the case was thrown out and the left wing judge went on a pathetic rant in her judgement because she was upset she had to declare Fox News the winner.

Nice try though son.
 

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
No. Fox News' lawyers cited precedent from a case where MSNBC lawyers argued that. Then the case was thrown out and the left wing judge went on a pathetic rant in her judgement because she was upset she had to declare Fox News the winner.

Nice try though son.
as usual you are wrong, i guess the voices in your head lied to you once again. It 's rather funny when Fox admits what we all knew: Tucker Carlson is full of :censored2:

Fox News won a court case by 'persuasively' arguing that no 'reasonable viewer' takes Tucker Carlson seriously​


A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" takes the primetime host Tucker Carlson seriously, a new court filing said.

Fox News asked the judge to toss out McDougal's case by arguing that "Carlson's statements were not statements of fact ..........
Fox News argued that Carlson "cannot be understood to have been stating facts, but instead that he was delivering an opinion using hyperbole for effect," the ruling said.

It added that Fox News "submits that the use of that word or an accusation of extortion, absent more, is simply 'loose, figurative, or hyperbolic language' that does not give rise to a defamation claim."

US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer ' any reasonable viewer arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism about the statements he makes
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
as usual you are wrong, i guess the voices in your head lied to you once again. It 's rather funny when Fox admits what we all knew: Tucker Carlson is full of :censored2:

Fox News won a court case by 'persuasively' arguing that no 'reasonable viewer' takes Tucker Carlson seriously​


A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" takes the primetime host Tucker Carlson seriously, a new court filing said.

Fox News asked the judge to toss out McDougal's case by arguing that "Carlson's statements were not statements of fact ..........
Fox News argued that Carlson "cannot be understood to have been stating facts, but instead that he was delivering an opinion using hyperbole for effect," the ruling said.

It added that Fox News "submits that the use of that word or an accusation of extortion, absent more, is simply 'loose, figurative, or hyperbolic language' that does not give rise to a defamation claim."

US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer ' any reasonable viewer arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism about the statements he makes
The quotes of Fox News lawyers are literally them quoting case precedent from the MSNBC case. Which is what I just said. They cited case precedent and the whore's lawsuit was thrown out.

Do you ever get tired of being wrong about everything?


The Fox team's legal briefs compared Carlson's show to radio talk-show programs hosted by ex-MSNBC and Fox Business star Don Imus, who won a case more than two decades ago because an appellate court ruled that "the complained of statements would not have been taken by reasonable listeners as factual pronouncements but simply as instances in which the defendant radio hosts had expressed their views over the air in the crude and hyperbolic manner that has, over the years, become their verbal stock in trade."
 

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
The quotes of Fox News lawyers are literally them quoting MSNBC lawyers. Which is what I just said. They cited case precedent and the whore's lawsuit was thrown out.

Do you ever get tired of being wrong about everything?
i proved my point old boy, you need to brush up on your reading skills. the judge and his lawyers said he's full of :censored2:
 
Top