Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
"You guys need to get a union!"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4347667" data-attributes="member: 63706"><p>Clearly UPS was concerned enough about a strike, and what it would mean to their stock price, that they offered to reopen negotiations. That advantage was completely thrown out the window. I mention Denis simply because he was the figurehead and mouthpiece of the negotiations, whoever is to blame didn't represent the members properly.</p><p></p><p>I don't think 22.4's were the solution to OT that anyone was asking for. Stronger and better enforced 9.5 language, language that would incentivize the company to hire more ground drivers, would have been more in line with the members' interests. That should have been the opener, not 22.4.</p><p></p><p>And if you remove the uninterested part timers from the equation, we would have easily met the 50% threshold (which would also have authorized a strike). So I can blame it at least partly on them. And you can't blame the members who did bother to vote, so who is left? Interested members who didn't vote, and those whose job it is to organize them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4347667, member: 63706"] Clearly UPS was concerned enough about a strike, and what it would mean to their stock price, that they offered to reopen negotiations. That advantage was completely thrown out the window. I mention Denis simply because he was the figurehead and mouthpiece of the negotiations, whoever is to blame didn't represent the members properly. I don't think 22.4's were the solution to OT that anyone was asking for. Stronger and better enforced 9.5 language, language that would incentivize the company to hire more ground drivers, would have been more in line with the members' interests. That should have been the opener, not 22.4. And if you remove the uninterested part timers from the equation, we would have easily met the 50% threshold (which would also have authorized a strike). So I can blame it at least partly on them. And you can't blame the members who did bother to vote, so who is left? Interested members who didn't vote, and those whose job it is to organize them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
"You guys need to get a union!"
Top