Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
22.3 Facts/Origins
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gandydancer" data-source="post: 179056" data-attributes="member: 9310"><p>22.3 began with the '98 contract and wasn't implemented until the latter half of '00 as a result of an arbitrator's decision (I got 2+ years differential back pay and ft building seniority backdated to '98, though I lost my '89 pt seniority for all purposes except tie breaking... the latter being a whole different can of worms, as the seniority issue was handled differently by different buildings, I understand). Dunno when air driving (Article 40) came into the contract, but it says the following: "Shuttle work currently being performed by part-time air drivers shall be converted to full-time air driver work WHEN THE DRIVER VACATES THE JOB except when there is not enough work available to create a full-time job." So I don't know where the BA and stewards got the idea that air driving was always supposed to be ft work -- the contract expressly contemplates pt air drivers. And, as with 22.3, the triggering mechanism for the work of the pt "job" to be available for creating a ft job is that the (pt) DRIVER vacate the job, not that the COMPANY kick him out.</p><p> </p><p>Do you have links for online versions of the contract? The web-based TDU version is good for quoting, but their pdf was buggy the times I downloaded it (searches would die). But I just found a non-buggy pdf version at NABER... I'd give the urls, but that would trigger a hold on this post. I've put the links up at a Yahoo Group I'm starting (independently) for my local called TransparencyProject, but I can't give you the url for that either, for the same reason. *SIGH*</p><p> </p><p>So, you're in a right-to-work state... At least you have a steward. I ran across another thread here ("<strong>can't be a steward?</strong> ")where the reload (is that same as Hub?) in a right-to-work state hadn't had a steward for four years and management was canvassing (PCM!) for one (just in case someone knew they didn't have to talk to management without a steward present?)... but nixed the poster when he volunteered because he wasn't friendly enough with management. And the BA, when confronted by the poster, nixed electing anyone for that shift because he already had three driver stewards (our stewards don't even get their dues paid, but I guess that local does pay something...else why?). WTF! Absurd! Unbelievable!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gandydancer, post: 179056, member: 9310"] 22.3 began with the '98 contract and wasn't implemented until the latter half of '00 as a result of an arbitrator's decision (I got 2+ years differential back pay and ft building seniority backdated to '98, though I lost my '89 pt seniority for all purposes except tie breaking... the latter being a whole different can of worms, as the seniority issue was handled differently by different buildings, I understand). Dunno when air driving (Article 40) came into the contract, but it says the following: "Shuttle work currently being performed by part-time air drivers shall be converted to full-time air driver work WHEN THE DRIVER VACATES THE JOB except when there is not enough work available to create a full-time job." So I don't know where the BA and stewards got the idea that air driving was always supposed to be ft work -- the contract expressly contemplates pt air drivers. And, as with 22.3, the triggering mechanism for the work of the pt "job" to be available for creating a ft job is that the (pt) DRIVER vacate the job, not that the COMPANY kick him out. Do you have links for online versions of the contract? The web-based TDU version is good for quoting, but their pdf was buggy the times I downloaded it (searches would die). But I just found a non-buggy pdf version at NABER... I'd give the urls, but that would trigger a hold on this post. I've put the links up at a Yahoo Group I'm starting (independently) for my local called TransparencyProject, but I can't give you the url for that either, for the same reason. *SIGH* So, you're in a right-to-work state... At least you have a steward. I ran across another thread here ("[B]can't be a steward?[/B] ")where the reload (is that same as Hub?) in a right-to-work state hadn't had a steward for four years and management was canvassing (PCM!) for one (just in case someone knew they didn't have to talk to management without a steward present?)... but nixed the poster when he volunteered because he wasn't friendly enough with management. And the BA, when confronted by the poster, nixed electing anyone for that shift because he already had three driver stewards (our stewards don't even get their dues paid, but I guess that local does pay something...else why?). WTF! Absurd! Unbelievable! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
22.3 Facts/Origins
Top