Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
22.4 Layoff
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="freehoodies" data-source="post: 5790553" data-attributes="member: 80887"><p>If they had an endless supply of money, they wouldn’t be cutting drivers right? </p><p></p><p>The contract specifies how we determine if there is enough work, it’s actually in the picture I posted, but its under article 37 section c if you want to look at it yourself. </p><p></p><p>If they are paying out 9.5 grievance's, and it’s determined to be due to inadequate staffing, then the arbitrator has the authority to award adversely affected employees back pay. Back pay clearly doesn't refer to employees making overtime, so it’s inferred that it refers to employees that could have helped alleviate 9.5 grievances but weren’t worked.</p><p></p><p>Its in managements best interest to not have to pay 9.5 grievances and overtime, to then have to pay the laid off employees anyway. Everybody wins if we just follow the contract we agreed on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="freehoodies, post: 5790553, member: 80887"] If they had an endless supply of money, they wouldn’t be cutting drivers right? The contract specifies how we determine if there is enough work, it’s actually in the picture I posted, but its under article 37 section c if you want to look at it yourself. If they are paying out 9.5 grievance's, and it’s determined to be due to inadequate staffing, then the arbitrator has the authority to award adversely affected employees back pay. Back pay clearly doesn't refer to employees making overtime, so it’s inferred that it refers to employees that could have helped alleviate 9.5 grievances but weren’t worked. Its in managements best interest to not have to pay 9.5 grievances and overtime, to then have to pay the laid off employees anyway. Everybody wins if we just follow the contract we agreed on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
22.4 Layoff
Top