Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
9/11
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 1197238" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>In regards to the 9-11 "truther" conspiracy theorists;</p><p></p><p>Wiring up the Twin Towers with explosives and then arranging for multiple airliners to be hijacked and subsequently flown into them immdiately prior to detonation as part of some sort of "false flag" incident is a conspiracy that is <em>far</em> too complex and would require the involvement, cooperation and silence of <em>far</em> too many people. There are too many potential points of failure. It simply is <em>not realistic</em>.</p><p>If, for the sake of argument, there <em>were</em> some rogue element within our government that was willing to kill thousands of US citizens and do billions of dollars worth of damage in order to justify a "war on terror" and the subsequent invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq....a far <em>simpler</em> and <em>more effective </em>method of accomplishing this would have been to detonate an extremely low-yield nuclear device (say, 2 kilotons which is 1/10th the power of the bomb we dropped on Hiroshima)in the underground garage of the WTC. In one fell swoop we would have it; the Towers destroyed; thousands killed or maimed; a weapon of mass destruction used against our nation, with "evidence" conveniently planted/arranged that would implicate Iraq (or Iran, or North Korea, or Libya, or Syria), the sympathy of the entire world, <em>and all the "justification" we would need to invade or bomb whoever we could "prove" was responsible</em>. Such a task could be accomplished by as little as 2 men, with a weapon that would fit in a car trunk, and the number of potentially compromising people who were "in the know" would be held to an <em>absolute minimum</em>.</p><p></p><p>If there <em>was</em> any sort of government conspiracy regarding 9-11...which I do find to be at least <em>plausible</em>.... it occured <em>after the fact</em> not before and its purpose was to either cover up the <em>negligence</em> of those who should have known about it and stopped it, or to manipulate the evidence and twist the narrative in order to more easily justify the resulting attack on our civil liberties and the subsequent invasion of a nation (Iraq) that had nothing to do with the attack in the first place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 1197238, member: 14668"] In regards to the 9-11 "truther" conspiracy theorists; Wiring up the Twin Towers with explosives and then arranging for multiple airliners to be hijacked and subsequently flown into them immdiately prior to detonation as part of some sort of "false flag" incident is a conspiracy that is [I]far[/I] too complex and would require the involvement, cooperation and silence of [I]far[/I] too many people. There are too many potential points of failure. It simply is [I]not realistic[/I]. If, for the sake of argument, there [I]were[/I] some rogue element within our government that was willing to kill thousands of US citizens and do billions of dollars worth of damage in order to justify a "war on terror" and the subsequent invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq....a far [I]simpler[/I] and [I]more effective [/I]method of accomplishing this would have been to detonate an extremely low-yield nuclear device (say, 2 kilotons which is 1/10th the power of the bomb we dropped on Hiroshima)in the underground garage of the WTC. In one fell swoop we would have it; the Towers destroyed; thousands killed or maimed; a weapon of mass destruction used against our nation, with "evidence" conveniently planted/arranged that would implicate Iraq (or Iran, or North Korea, or Libya, or Syria), the sympathy of the entire world, [I]and all the "justification" we would need to invade or bomb whoever we could "prove" was responsible[/I]. Such a task could be accomplished by as little as 2 men, with a weapon that would fit in a car trunk, and the number of potentially compromising people who were "in the know" would be held to an [I]absolute minimum[/I]. If there [I]was[/I] any sort of government conspiracy regarding 9-11...which I do find to be at least [I]plausible[/I].... it occured [I]after the fact[/I] not before and its purpose was to either cover up the [I]negligence[/I] of those who should have known about it and stopped it, or to manipulate the evidence and twist the narrative in order to more easily justify the resulting attack on our civil liberties and the subsequent invasion of a nation (Iraq) that had nothing to do with the attack in the first place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
9/11
Top