Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
A supervisor stands up to the IE manager...and pays the price
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="UPS Lifer" data-source="post: 607056" data-attributes="member: 9789"><p>Again - maybe up in Oregon - but now that Oregon is again part of the Pacific Region I highly doubt any of your claims. Most of what you say is some sort of conspiracy theory! It is what you want to believe or want others to believe. They find it easy to get on the band wagon because they are just as upset as you are. </p><p></p><p>Back up your claims with a smoking gun. Show me a memo or an email from your department head of IE that states your claims. I you can't do that .... take it down a couple of notches! LOL!</p><p></p><p>Besides all the other jobs I had, I managed operations and departments from 1986 to 2007. I worked as a manager in the IE department and NEVER did I EVER hear or see my boss push your conspiracies down the ranks. Believe me when I say that I am not a fan of IE. When allowances are tightened it makes everyone work harder. NOBODY wants to work any harder than they have to....nobody!</p><p></p><p>Hear is what I heard and saw in 36 years. </p><p>In 1982 - A district manager condoned supervisors working until a union official blasted him and then he denied it.... I lost all respect for that guy.</p><p></p><p>In the 80s and early 90's</p><p>I saw a handful of center management teams play with the timecards and change stats - some lost their jobs and some didn't because they stopped after realizing they would lose their job. </p><p></p><p>I saw supervisors and managers tell drivers (not threaten) to put down lunches that were not taken. Most got away with that. It usually involved drivers working under 4 hours or over 9.5 or over 12 hours. The over 12 was illegal besides being unethical.</p><p></p><p>I saw LP (now Security) investigate management as much as any non-management. Management that cheated lost their jobs and when an allegation came up it was investigated and nobody looked the other way. </p><p></p><p><strong>What irritates me about your comments is that you make allegations that you can't back up with hard evidence. </strong></p><p></p><p>Back it up with hard evidence and you won't hear a peep out of me. </p><p></p><p>I guess what I am saying is that with my position and connections from the corporate level through the region and into the district, I could not have been shielded from corporate, region or district culture that is indicative to your conspiracy theories. </p><p></p><p>Send me an email with hard evidence and I will recant this post.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="UPS Lifer, post: 607056, member: 9789"] Again - maybe up in Oregon - but now that Oregon is again part of the Pacific Region I highly doubt any of your claims. Most of what you say is some sort of conspiracy theory! It is what you want to believe or want others to believe. They find it easy to get on the band wagon because they are just as upset as you are. Back up your claims with a smoking gun. Show me a memo or an email from your department head of IE that states your claims. I you can't do that .... take it down a couple of notches! LOL! Besides all the other jobs I had, I managed operations and departments from 1986 to 2007. I worked as a manager in the IE department and NEVER did I EVER hear or see my boss push your conspiracies down the ranks. Believe me when I say that I am not a fan of IE. When allowances are tightened it makes everyone work harder. NOBODY wants to work any harder than they have to....nobody! Hear is what I heard and saw in 36 years. In 1982 - A district manager condoned supervisors working until a union official blasted him and then he denied it.... I lost all respect for that guy. In the 80s and early 90's I saw a handful of center management teams play with the timecards and change stats - some lost their jobs and some didn't because they stopped after realizing they would lose their job. I saw supervisors and managers tell drivers (not threaten) to put down lunches that were not taken. Most got away with that. It usually involved drivers working under 4 hours or over 9.5 or over 12 hours. The over 12 was illegal besides being unethical. I saw LP (now Security) investigate management as much as any non-management. Management that cheated lost their jobs and when an allegation came up it was investigated and nobody looked the other way. [B]What irritates me about your comments is that you make allegations that you can't back up with hard evidence. [/B] Back it up with hard evidence and you won't hear a peep out of me. I guess what I am saying is that with my position and connections from the corporate level through the region and into the district, I could not have been shielded from corporate, region or district culture that is indicative to your conspiracy theories. Send me an email with hard evidence and I will recant this post. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
A supervisor stands up to the IE manager...and pays the price
Top