Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
A supervisor stands up to the IE manager...and pays the price
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pretzel_man" data-source="post: 607200" data-attributes="member: 927"><p>We are going to go around in circles on this argument. I'll make my point here, and then let you have the last word.</p><p> </p><p>How can you and others here simumtaneously talk about management mistakes and inefficiencies and then imply that the overallowed pointed out by work measurement doesn't exist? It only confirms the inefficiencies that you pointed out.</p><p> </p><p>Like all systems, the UPS system is flawed. Even by I.E.'s own standards, work measurement is only 95% accurate, 95% of the time. You however not only point out the known flaws but then assert that they were purposely placed there as part of a conspiracy theory.</p><p> </p><p>If they were purposeful, why is it that in all my years, I have never been told about them. Why with all the classes I took and taught was I never given that insight. I have known every corporate head of I.E. very well all the way back to Bob Logan. Of course you can say that I am part of the conspiracy.</p><p> </p><p>You seem to ignore facts that don't support your theory. I suggested that you look at how the planning system calculates in order to prove that overallowed is included in the plan. That fact was not important to you.</p><p> </p><p>I have a thick skin. I can handle criticism. What I won't accept is your accusation that me and others like me purposely set up a system to take advantage of others. </p><p> </p><p>As I said, I will give you the last word without a response.</p><p> </p><p>P-Man</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pretzel_man, post: 607200, member: 927"] We are going to go around in circles on this argument. I'll make my point here, and then let you have the last word. How can you and others here simumtaneously talk about management mistakes and inefficiencies and then imply that the overallowed pointed out by work measurement doesn't exist? It only confirms the inefficiencies that you pointed out. Like all systems, the UPS system is flawed. Even by I.E.'s own standards, work measurement is only 95% accurate, 95% of the time. You however not only point out the known flaws but then assert that they were purposely placed there as part of a conspiracy theory. If they were purposeful, why is it that in all my years, I have never been told about them. Why with all the classes I took and taught was I never given that insight. I have known every corporate head of I.E. very well all the way back to Bob Logan. Of course you can say that I am part of the conspiracy. You seem to ignore facts that don't support your theory. I suggested that you look at how the planning system calculates in order to prove that overallowed is included in the plan. That fact was not important to you. I have a thick skin. I can handle criticism. What I won't accept is your accusation that me and others like me purposely set up a system to take advantage of others. As I said, I will give you the last word without a response. P-Man [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
A supervisor stands up to the IE manager...and pays the price
Top