Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
BBC News: What happened to global warming?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="chev" data-source="post: 617522" data-attributes="member: 6761"><p>February 23, 2009 <strong>Media Credibility, Not Ice Caps, In Meltdown</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>By</strong> <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/peter_c_glover/" target="_blank"><strong>Peter C Glover</strong></a></p><p> </p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px">Eco-warriors and media hype aside, <span style="color: Red">the fact is, as we head into 2009, that the world's ice mass has been expanding <span style="color: Blue"><strong><em>not</em></strong></span> contracting.</span> Which will surprise evening news junkies fed a diet of polar bears floating about on ice floes and snow shelves falling into the oceans. But if a whole series of reports on ice growth in the Arctic, the Antarctic and among glaciers are right, then it is truth in the mainstream media (MSM) that's in meltdown not the polar ice caps. </span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">The problem for the MSM is that it long ago nailed its colors to the climate alarmist mast. No ice cap meltdown, no rising waters. No disappearing islands, no reason for alarm. No alarm, no story. Worst of all having called <em>yet another</em> global apocalypse wrong: No credibility. So the MSM has a significant stake in running highly selective warm-mongering headlines. Not to mention disparaging those scientists who have the temerity to disagree as ' and 'pseudo-scientists'.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">There's nothing more the climate alarmist media loves than a 'melting Arctic' ice cap story. So why not stories from the far larger expanse of ice that is the 'melting' Antarctic? Well it might have something to do with the fact that the Antarctic ice <em>grew to <a href="http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog/a_new_record_for_antartic_total_ice_extent" target="_blank">record levels</a> in 2007 - </em>and continues to grow.</span></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #000000">The Antarctic</span></span></strong></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">"The media has ignored the increase in Antarctica sea ice cover in recent years, with at present, a coverage that is one million square kilometres above average." </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Full Article here </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/02/media_credibility_not_ice_caps_1.html" target="_blank">http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/02/media_credibility_not_ice_caps_1.html</a></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="chev, post: 617522, member: 6761"] February 23, 2009 [B]Media Credibility, Not Ice Caps, In Meltdown[/B] [B]By[/B] [URL='http://www.americanthinker.com/peter_c_glover/'][B]Peter C Glover[/B][/URL] [SIZE=3]Eco-warriors and media hype aside, [COLOR=Red]the fact is, as we head into 2009, that the world's ice mass has been expanding [COLOR=Blue][B][I]not[/I][/B][/COLOR] contracting.[/COLOR] Which will surprise evening news junkies fed a diet of polar bears floating about on ice floes and snow shelves falling into the oceans. But if a whole series of reports on ice growth in the Arctic, the Antarctic and among glaciers are right, then it is truth in the mainstream media (MSM) that's in meltdown not the polar ice caps. [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]The problem for the MSM is that it long ago nailed its colors to the climate alarmist mast. No ice cap meltdown, no rising waters. No disappearing islands, no reason for alarm. No alarm, no story. Worst of all having called [I]yet another[/I] global apocalypse wrong: No credibility. So the MSM has a significant stake in running highly selective warm-mongering headlines. Not to mention disparaging those scientists who have the temerity to disagree as ' and 'pseudo-scientists'.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]There's nothing more the climate alarmist media loves than a 'melting Arctic' ice cap story. So why not stories from the far larger expanse of ice that is the 'melting' Antarctic? Well it might have something to do with the fact that the Antarctic ice [I]grew to [URL='http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog/a_new_record_for_antartic_total_ice_extent']record levels[/URL] in 2007 - [/I]and continues to grow.[/SIZE] [B][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000]The Antarctic[/COLOR][/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=3]"The media has ignored the increase in Antarctica sea ice cover in recent years, with at present, a coverage that is one million square kilometres above average." Full Article here [url]http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/02/media_credibility_not_ice_caps_1.html[/url][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
BBC News: What happened to global warming?
Top