Biden's supreme Court pick

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Again, for the umpteenth time, the lady from the hospital's financial aid office stopped by my room, asked me about insurance, asked me a few more questions, told me they should be able to get this approved to be written off, that they would take care of the bill. And they did. Over $107,000. I have a separate $6400 surgeons bill and a couple of other bills in the hundreds. For some reason you want to make this into some action I took to get this bill cancelled. And I was fully prepared to send them something every month. But not much. It obviously is to their advantage to have it written off rather than get a small payment monthly until I die. And by the way I did show where you said that Republicans should refuse to take Social Security since they don't believe in it. Do a search on your name and the word benefits and you'll turn up multiple posts. And no matter how many times I've said that Social Security is a great program and the best idea Dems ever had you try to portray me as someone who hates SS. Or only like it because it benefits me directly. All I've ever said about spending programs is they're fine if you can afford them but we can't keep spending money we don't have. Something you seem to take great offense to as if no limits should ever be put on spending. We are in a world of hurt because instead of being responsible after actually balancing the budget in the 90's we've gone on a spending spree that isn't sustainable. And we will have to cut government spending someday whether you like it or not because we'll be spending so much on servicing our debt. And all the vicious name calling on the part of people like you won't change that fact.
Typical selective conservative. Dem sponsored and passed bills that benefit you are just great but those that don't are a waste of taxpayer dollars. Again you still refuse to identify the party that got stuck with YOUR hospital bill. Until you do then one can rightfully conclude that is was Medicaid. That is what you keep trying to coverup. Non profit hospitals have to accept Medicaid patients. Furthermore you specifically stated that you received an itemized bill for your procedure which in turn means that you know damn well who that bill was dumped onto. And obviously the hospital decided rather than to wait 20 years for you to pay 10% of the bill they chose to use the public funding readily available because it would never survive waiting for you to pay up. Instead of trying to cover it up get behind the effort to do what has to be done so that the public benefits plan that served you quite well will be there for others in the days ahead.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
The qualifications of Judge Jackson have long since been established or she would never have risen to that of a federal appeals court judge.
"Minimally qualified" as you say, right?
Lol.
Don't come much more minimally qualified than ACB.
Screenshot_20220406-094649_Chrome.jpg
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
The qualifications of Judge Jackson have long since been established or she would never have risen to that of a federal appeals court judge. Going forward old white males will never again have absolute hold on this nation's levers of power.
There are plenty of judges on appellate courts who are never considered for the Supreme Court. When one is considered he/she should be thoroughly vetted on their judicial philosophy. What just happened with Jackson was well within the parameters of such vetting unlike the smear campaign given Brett Kavanaugh. Doesn't matter what race or gender they are but it very much matters picking the most qualified candidate. Considering the climate today asking Jackson the definition of a woman seems appropriate. That she refused to answer tells me the Dems have nominated an activist to the Supreme Court. I'm sure you're thrilled.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Typical selective conservative. Dem sponsored and passed bills that benefit you are just great but those that don't are a waste of taxpayer dollars. Again you still refuse to identify the party that got stuck with YOUR hospital bill. Until you do then one can rightfully conclude that is was Medicaid. That is what you keep trying to coverup. Non profit hospitals have to accept Medicaid patients. Furthermore you specifically stated that you received an itemized bill for your procedure which in turn means that you know damn well who that bill was dumped onto. And obviously the hospital decided rather than to wait 20 years for you to pay 10% of the bill they chose to use the public funding readily available because it would never survive waiting for you to pay up. Instead of trying to cover it up get behind the effort to do what has to be done so that the public benefits plan that served you quite well will be there for others in the days ahead.
What coverup? Since March 5th I've either been in the hospital or at home. I have only spoken to the hospital's financial aid office and not a lot. You act like what happened with me is unique. I'm pretty certain that you damn well don't have a clue. It's funny that for someone who advocates the government spend money like there's no tomorrow but when money is actually spent on someone you deem unworthy(if the government actually did)you come unglued. Looky looky, I'm getting money spent on me after a lifetime of hard work while millions lived off government benefits. Seems fair to me! Hell, I may go find something else for them to spend money on me! Bwahahahaha!!
 

BlackFriday

Please remove my account. This forum sucks.
The qualifications of Judge Jackson have long since been established or she would never have risen to that of a federal appeals court judge. Going forward old white males will never again have absolute hold on this nation's levers of power.
Your a bleeding heart hallucinationist.
You still loving Brandon?
 

Sportello

Well-Known Member
"Minimally qualified" as you say, right?
Lol.
Her qualifications were that she worked on Bush v Gore, as did Roberts and Kavanaugh. She never tried a case as a lawyer before she was appointed by Trump to the 7th Circuit.

She is a member of a fringe, Pentecostal, Catholic organization.

She is a member of the Federalist Society, which is a litmus test for Right Wing, extremist, judgeships.

As has been mentioned many times, she was 'groomed' for her role from the onset of her career.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
Her qualifications were that she worked on Bush v Gore, as did Roberts and Kavanaugh. She never tried a case as a lawyer before she was appointed by Trump to the 7th Circuit.

She is a member of a fringe, Pentecostal, Catholic organization.

She is a member of the Federalist Society, which is a litmus test for Right Wing, extremist, judgeships.

As has been mentioned many times, she was 'groomed' for her role from the onset of her career.
Keep seething my radical left wing friend.
Lol.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Her qualifications were that she worked on Bush v Gore, as did Roberts and Kavanaugh. She never tried a case as a lawyer before she was appointed by Trump to the 7th Circuit.

She is a member of a fringe, Pentecostal, Catholic organization.

She is a member of the Federalist Society, which is a litmus test for Right Wing, extremist, judgeships.

As has been mentioned many times, she was 'groomed' for her role from the onset of her career.
Teaching law at Notre Dame?
 

bottomups

Bad Moon Risen'
Her qualifications were that she worked on Bush v Gore, as did Roberts and Kavanaugh. She never tried a case as a lawyer before she was appointed by Trump to the 7th Circuit.

She is a member of a fringe, Pentecostal, Catholic organization.

She is a member of the Federalist Society, which is a litmus test for Right Wing, extremist, judgeships.

As has been mentioned many times, she was 'groomed' for her role from the onset of her career.
She's catholic? Must be pro pedophile.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
I'm sure this will never see the light of day, nut it reinforces this:

View attachment 379370

Can you point me to any articles that explain her having given pedophiles light sentences? Other than her own reasoning in her confirmation testimony that the sheer volume of child pornography that technology allows should be weighted differently than traditional distribution methods?

I’m trying to assume that I’m just ignorant of the facts here and I can be convinced that she was a good pick.
 
Top