Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
UPS Subsidiaries
UPS Information Technology
Big Changes Ahead in TSG
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Enough" data-source="post: 477188" data-attributes="member: 20868"><p>P-Man,</p><p>You endorse a double standard. Management thinks it helps the bottom line by getting rid of excess technicians and admins. </p><p> </p><p>You fail to recognize the overload of management who still dont even have assignments due to the consolidations. This excess of management in many districts, costs the company much more money than the few techs and admins you are getting rid of. </p><p> </p><p>The truth is management wants to point the finger at anyone they can, so they can justify their jobs by falsely axing some tech or admin. Who will be covering the permanent admin jobs or a tech when needed? The supervisors who make more money. How does that save money by replacing a lower paid person with a higher paid person? It doesnt, it just saves a job for the brotherhood of management. Many of the techs affected have more years of service than most of the newer supervisors. They worked their way up and management picks on us because they can. Techs are shareholders too, except we had to pay for ours.</p><p> </p><p>As a shareholder I think the excess of management should be cut. How would that feel after devoting 10-15 years of your life here?</p><p> </p><p>Do unto others.......</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Enough, post: 477188, member: 20868"] P-Man, You endorse a double standard. Management thinks it helps the bottom line by getting rid of excess technicians and admins. You fail to recognize the overload of management who still dont even have assignments due to the consolidations. This excess of management in many districts, costs the company much more money than the few techs and admins you are getting rid of. The truth is management wants to point the finger at anyone they can, so they can justify their jobs by falsely axing some tech or admin. Who will be covering the permanent admin jobs or a tech when needed? The supervisors who make more money. How does that save money by replacing a lower paid person with a higher paid person? It doesnt, it just saves a job for the brotherhood of management. Many of the techs affected have more years of service than most of the newer supervisors. They worked their way up and management picks on us because they can. Techs are shareholders too, except we had to pay for ours. As a shareholder I think the excess of management should be cut. How would that feel after devoting 10-15 years of your life here? Do unto others....... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
UPS Subsidiaries
UPS Information Technology
Big Changes Ahead in TSG
Top