Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
UPS Subsidiaries
UPS Information Technology
Big Changes Ahead in TSG
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pretzel_man" data-source="post: 477371" data-attributes="member: 927"><p>There are 1400 excess management people right now. In general somewhere around 3000 leave each year (due to retirement, job change, etc.) If things go as they have in the past, it will take about a year or less to reduce the excess management through attrition.</p><p> </p><p>The same was NOT true of TSG. There were more excess than attrition would reduce. Some were reassigned, some left voluntarily, some were cut.</p><p> </p><p>I'm glad the management committee felt that we should let attrition handle the excess management. I think that in general management has sacrificed over the years (lack of stock growth, reduced raises, increased workload, etc.)</p><p> </p><p>Of course, there are others in management who would be glad if we just lopped of the poorest performing management people and cut the excess immediately. </p><p> </p><p>Sounds like your beliefs are closer to theirs than mine.</p><p> </p><p>P-Man</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pretzel_man, post: 477371, member: 927"] There are 1400 excess management people right now. In general somewhere around 3000 leave each year (due to retirement, job change, etc.) If things go as they have in the past, it will take about a year or less to reduce the excess management through attrition. The same was NOT true of TSG. There were more excess than attrition would reduce. Some were reassigned, some left voluntarily, some were cut. I'm glad the management committee felt that we should let attrition handle the excess management. I think that in general management has sacrificed over the years (lack of stock growth, reduced raises, increased workload, etc.) Of course, there are others in management who would be glad if we just lopped of the poorest performing management people and cut the excess immediately. Sounds like your beliefs are closer to theirs than mine. P-Man [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
UPS Subsidiaries
UPS Information Technology
Big Changes Ahead in TSG
Top