Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
UPS Subsidiaries
UPS Information Technology
Big Changes Ahead in TSG
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fastgeorge" data-source="post: 478879" data-attributes="member: 12608"><p>years ago I was proud doing a good tsg job.</p><p>I felt contributing to the success of the company.</p><p>Now it feels like being obsolete, replaceable.</p><p>Sooner or later (this year or next year) I am written obsolete.</p><p></p><p>I think our marketing was not good enough.</p><p>We lived in the dreamland and thought of ourselfs to be competent.</p><p>But what did others see?</p><p>Sitting around. Rebooting sometimes. Dedusting. Changing keyboards.</p><p>That things we did, that really counted, could not be seen or not be</p><p>grasped by those that now evaluate our future in the company.</p><p></p><p>Trainig a tech takes 3 weeks. Some more to do his A+.</p><p>Then you have a dedusting, rebooting clerk. But not more is needed or wanted.</p><p></p><p>I do have a little example for you:</p><p>Inside HDFS Reporting, right column GENERAL you can generate a report of</p><p>the top 30 SOSS makers. It has been noticed, that amongst those top callers</p><p>are also TSG. And TSG should not make SOSS for themselfs. That should now be</p><p>handled by management. With action plans. As that would be false statistics.</p><p>But if you had a closer look at this report, then you would see that almost all</p><p>that soss the tsg tech had written himself he did not generate himself, but he</p><p>did write something repair or obsolete and the system generated that soss in</p><p>his name. But it looks like, that nobody did notice that, yet.</p><p></p><p>I hope, sooner or later, that our work we do is looked at. If not, then good</p><p>by and good night.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fastgeorge, post: 478879, member: 12608"] years ago I was proud doing a good tsg job. I felt contributing to the success of the company. Now it feels like being obsolete, replaceable. Sooner or later (this year or next year) I am written obsolete. I think our marketing was not good enough. We lived in the dreamland and thought of ourselfs to be competent. But what did others see? Sitting around. Rebooting sometimes. Dedusting. Changing keyboards. That things we did, that really counted, could not be seen or not be grasped by those that now evaluate our future in the company. Trainig a tech takes 3 weeks. Some more to do his A+. Then you have a dedusting, rebooting clerk. But not more is needed or wanted. I do have a little example for you: Inside HDFS Reporting, right column GENERAL you can generate a report of the top 30 SOSS makers. It has been noticed, that amongst those top callers are also TSG. And TSG should not make SOSS for themselfs. That should now be handled by management. With action plans. As that would be false statistics. But if you had a closer look at this report, then you would see that almost all that soss the tsg tech had written himself he did not generate himself, but he did write something repair or obsolete and the system generated that soss in his name. But it looks like, that nobody did notice that, yet. I hope, sooner or later, that our work we do is looked at. If not, then good by and good night. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
UPS Subsidiaries
UPS Information Technology
Big Changes Ahead in TSG
Top