Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
Buyout in 2013
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrownSuit" data-source="post: 1076604" data-attributes="member: 14437"><p>Hoax - </p><p></p><p>Last time I checked my Class A shares had the same voting rights as Scott Davis. The only difference is he has a whole lot more of them than I do. At the end of the day a partner is a partner, there is no junior or senior level. It seems like these are levels that have unfortunately been created in your mind, possibly while you were out at Innoplex and out of touch with the rest of the company. </p><p></p><p>I think you would be surprised how many of your so called Junior Partners actually own more of the company than your so called Senior Partners. </p><p></p><p>This is throughout our company's legacy as it can be seen in all of the writings of our former leaders and even in our policy book with details like addressing each other on a first name basis. It doesn't say that we address Grade 18's and up on a last name basis and those below on a first name basis. </p><p></p><p>I don't see a problem with your undertone, I see an out of touch employee who might be better suited for retirement and wish you the best as you enjoy the benefits of partnership. When Jim Casey established the company, a partner was a partner. Jim understood that a healthy, thriving company would be creating more partners. Not junior partners, not senior partners, PARTNERS. The measure of partnership was never decision making ability, but ownership in the company. Regardless of the role we all have the ability to make decisions and take actions that impact our Stakeholders. </p><p></p><p>In the new structure grade 20 and up is a partner, but keep in mind that it tops out at grade 70.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrownSuit, post: 1076604, member: 14437"] Hoax - Last time I checked my Class A shares had the same voting rights as Scott Davis. The only difference is he has a whole lot more of them than I do. At the end of the day a partner is a partner, there is no junior or senior level. It seems like these are levels that have unfortunately been created in your mind, possibly while you were out at Innoplex and out of touch with the rest of the company. I think you would be surprised how many of your so called Junior Partners actually own more of the company than your so called Senior Partners. This is throughout our company's legacy as it can be seen in all of the writings of our former leaders and even in our policy book with details like addressing each other on a first name basis. It doesn't say that we address Grade 18's and up on a last name basis and those below on a first name basis. I don't see a problem with your undertone, I see an out of touch employee who might be better suited for retirement and wish you the best as you enjoy the benefits of partnership. When Jim Casey established the company, a partner was a partner. Jim understood that a healthy, thriving company would be creating more partners. Not junior partners, not senior partners, PARTNERS. The measure of partnership was never decision making ability, but ownership in the company. Regardless of the role we all have the ability to make decisions and take actions that impact our Stakeholders. In the new structure grade 20 and up is a partner, but keep in mind that it tops out at grade 70. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
Buyout in 2013
Top