Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
Corp Marketing Layoffs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dannyboy" data-source="post: 689535" data-attributes="member: 484"><p><span style="color: blue"><strong>How funny, another fine example of how out of touch with reality sales guy is. And instead of admitting his mouth outran his brain, he posted the good old standby</strong></span></p><p></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: blue"><strong>Ah yes, jealous because he had to make a concession before he got a raise? How terrible. And I am impressed, all of 9 posts before his hatred of the delivery force is made evident. What's that got to do with the thread????????</strong></span></p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I dont know how I missed this thread, but I see Sock's alter ego is back at it. Prime examples both of why a union will always be needed at ups. Not because it is a bad place to work, but because of people that think they are so much better than anyone else around them.</p><p> </p><p>Pman, some interesting posts. I would humbly suggest that part of the reason the majority were cast aside was that it is cheaper these days to find someone with the credentials the company needs than to train someone that does not have the skills for the job. Used to be, UPS would invest in its employees to see they got trained/had the knack for what ever job needed done. But not anymore.</p><p> </p><p>Which brings me to the second question. Was it not the UPS corp management committee that placed people in many jobs in the first place? Why would they make an assignment like that, knowing that the people assigned were under prepared for the challenge.</p><p> </p><p>My condolences to the people, regardless of who they are. Losing a job is tough enough. Being manhandled is another.</p><p> </p><p>friend</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dannyboy, post: 689535, member: 484"] [COLOR=blue][B]How funny, another fine example of how out of touch with reality sales guy is. And instead of admitting his mouth outran his brain, he posted the good old standby[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR=blue][B]Ah yes, jealous because he had to make a concession before he got a raise? How terrible. And I am impressed, all of 9 posts before his hatred of the delivery force is made evident. What's that got to do with the thread????????[/B][/COLOR] I dont know how I missed this thread, but I see Sock's alter ego is back at it. Prime examples both of why a union will always be needed at ups. Not because it is a bad place to work, but because of people that think they are so much better than anyone else around them. Pman, some interesting posts. I would humbly suggest that part of the reason the majority were cast aside was that it is cheaper these days to find someone with the credentials the company needs than to train someone that does not have the skills for the job. Used to be, UPS would invest in its employees to see they got trained/had the knack for what ever job needed done. But not anymore. Which brings me to the second question. Was it not the UPS corp management committee that placed people in many jobs in the first place? Why would they make an assignment like that, knowing that the people assigned were under prepared for the challenge. My condolences to the people, regardless of who they are. Losing a job is tough enough. Being manhandled is another. friend [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
Corp Marketing Layoffs
Top