Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
demonstration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 975724" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>I wonder why the author choose to never mention a historical proven in the FBI's old CoIntelPro operation. On page 6 the author came close in speaking of MLK and McCarthy era tactics but missed a golden opportunity IMO to show hard and proven evidence of an FBI track record in the very type tactics this piece alleges. </p><p></p><p>And in the case of Brandon Darby, why did the author not mention that Darby is now a contributing writer to Breitbart and is doing the rounds of speaking to conservative groups? Raises the question is he on the job but just moved across the street? And why didn't the author mention how Darby infiltrated a New Orleans charity Common Ground that was established to help Katrina survivors? I understand time and space but at least some footnote would have added further clarity to the piece IMO. In Feb. @ C4SS, Kevin Carson wrote a <a href="http://c4ss.org/content/9802" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">piece</span></a> on undercover provocateurs and specifically mention the likes of one Brandon Darby. I agree that some people shouldn't be so stupid in the first place but then the FBI would then just resort to the past practices of CoIntelPro by planting false evidence and then proceeding anyway with false charges to put people away. And it worked time and time again because the stupid public is too stupid to even question their gov't in the first place!</p><p></p><p>Even the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/k/kelly-evidence.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">FBI lab</span></a> is known for not only bad lab work but even questionable if not false evidence creation.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If gov't is so bad with so many other things, if it can't educate kids, carry the mail or all the other stuff so many like to point out, then why do they always give a pass when it comes to law enforcement and going to war? Why is it that certain people always want it both ways?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 975724, member: 2189"] I wonder why the author choose to never mention a historical proven in the FBI's old CoIntelPro operation. On page 6 the author came close in speaking of MLK and McCarthy era tactics but missed a golden opportunity IMO to show hard and proven evidence of an FBI track record in the very type tactics this piece alleges. And in the case of Brandon Darby, why did the author not mention that Darby is now a contributing writer to Breitbart and is doing the rounds of speaking to conservative groups? Raises the question is he on the job but just moved across the street? And why didn't the author mention how Darby infiltrated a New Orleans charity Common Ground that was established to help Katrina survivors? I understand time and space but at least some footnote would have added further clarity to the piece IMO. In Feb. @ C4SS, Kevin Carson wrote a [URL="http://c4ss.org/content/9802"][COLOR=#ff0000]piece[/COLOR][/URL] on undercover provocateurs and specifically mention the likes of one Brandon Darby. I agree that some people shouldn't be so stupid in the first place but then the FBI would then just resort to the past practices of CoIntelPro by planting false evidence and then proceeding anyway with false charges to put people away. And it worked time and time again because the stupid public is too stupid to even question their gov't in the first place! Even the [URL="http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/k/kelly-evidence.html"][COLOR=#ff0000]FBI lab[/COLOR][/URL] is known for not only bad lab work but even questionable if not false evidence creation. If gov't is so bad with so many other things, if it can't educate kids, carry the mail or all the other stuff so many like to point out, then why do they always give a pass when it comes to law enforcement and going to war? Why is it that certain people always want it both ways? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
demonstration
Top