Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Fed Expectations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brownIEman" data-source="post: 549384" data-attributes="member: 14596"><p>The same can be said of the Teamster's leadership.</p><p> </p><p>The big thing imo that the Teamsters will never admit is that everything that was gained in that contract could have been had WITHOUT striking. It would have taken longer, meant working under the old contract past the expiration. That was done in the past, and UPS asked for it to happend in '97, the Teamsters refused. </p><p> </p><p>In any event, hopefully hard leasons were learned by both sides. The fact that this past contract was penned months AHEAD of the expiration leads me to believe they were.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brownIEman, post: 549384, member: 14596"] The same can be said of the Teamster's leadership. The big thing imo that the Teamsters will never admit is that everything that was gained in that contract could have been had WITHOUT striking. It would have taken longer, meant working under the old contract past the expiration. That was done in the past, and UPS asked for it to happend in '97, the Teamsters refused. In any event, hopefully hard leasons were learned by both sides. The fact that this past contract was penned months AHEAD of the expiration leads me to believe they were. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Fed Expectations
Top