Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Fed Expectations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brownIEman" data-source="post: 550021" data-attributes="member: 14596"><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #000000">Are you saying that anything that would reward employees for the company doing well (stock ownership and bonuses) can only be explained as a plan to break the union? Really? You can’t think of any other legitimate reason the company might want to have employees have a vested interest in the company doing well other than union breaking?</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #000000">To clarify another misconception: The company never asked to “Take over” as you put it, the pension. UPS asked to buy out of the multi-employer pension plans so UPS dollars would go only to UPS pensioners. The plan was a win-win for UPS and UPSers, because with UPS dollars only going to UPS pensioners, UPS could spend fewer dollars, but the UPS pensioners would have more dollars between them in the plan. The plan was set up to be managed by an equal number of UPS and Teamsters representatives. So, really, UPS was asking for UPS AND the Teamsters to take over the pensions.</span></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brownIEman, post: 550021, member: 14596"] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000]Are you saying that anything that would reward employees for the company doing well (stock ownership and bonuses) can only be explained as a plan to break the union? Really? You can’t think of any other legitimate reason the company might want to have employees have a vested interest in the company doing well other than union breaking?[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000] [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000]To clarify another misconception: The company never asked to “Take over” as you put it, the pension. UPS asked to buy out of the multi-employer pension plans so UPS dollars would go only to UPS pensioners. The plan was a win-win for UPS and UPSers, because with UPS dollars only going to UPS pensioners, UPS could spend fewer dollars, but the UPS pensioners would have more dollars between them in the plan. The plan was set up to be managed by an equal number of UPS and Teamsters representatives. So, really, UPS was asking for UPS AND the Teamsters to take over the pensions.[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Fed Expectations
Top