Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Fed Expectations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brownIEman" data-source="post: 550399" data-attributes="member: 14596"><p>OK, but in the way the plan was proposed in '97, each of those steps you describe would have had to be agreed to by the Teamsters representatives on the pension governing board. That is what the company asked for, a plan governed equally by UPS and the Teamsters. So, if it was the plan to "suddenly switch to a 401K" UPS would have had to get the Teamsters to agree to a sudden switch to a 401K. </p><p></p><p>You really think that could have happened? You really think the company was stupid enough to think it might?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brownIEman, post: 550399, member: 14596"] OK, but in the way the plan was proposed in '97, each of those steps you describe would have had to be agreed to by the Teamsters representatives on the pension governing board. That is what the company asked for, a plan governed equally by UPS and the Teamsters. So, if it was the plan to "suddenly switch to a 401K" UPS would have had to get the Teamsters to agree to a sudden switch to a 401K. You really think that could have happened? You really think the company was stupid enough to think it might? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Fed Expectations
Top