Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Feeder Q-List Question - Being On-Call
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stray" data-source="post: 2280610" data-attributes="member: 57407"><p>we've had no terminations for not answering, but one driver accepted a suspension for not answering his phone multiple times after being warned. this was against the advice of the steward present, but the driver wanted the time off...</p><p></p><p>the one loophole that will always be there is SAFETY. i would opt for "not rested" as opposed to "drunk".</p><p></p><p>as mentioned above, i would look at your local supplement for layoff or on-call language that may apply. also, if they have permitted drivers to not answer or pass before, "past practice" would apply.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stray, post: 2280610, member: 57407"] we've had no terminations for not answering, but one driver accepted a suspension for not answering his phone multiple times after being warned. this was against the advice of the steward present, but the driver wanted the time off... the one loophole that will always be there is SAFETY. i would opt for "not rested" as opposed to "drunk". as mentioned above, i would look at your local supplement for layoff or on-call language that may apply. also, if they have permitted drivers to not answer or pass before, "past practice" would apply. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Feeder Q-List Question - Being On-Call
Top