Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Fred Z to endorse the L-396 Richard G Slate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 1403586" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>Im not surprised.</p><p></p><p>I am in NEITHER ones camp. None of the above would be my choice if it was an option. However, this time around, I will support Ron.</p><p></p><p>Not because I "like" his leadership, but rather, I fear what G could do to the membership. </p><p></p><p>Let me point something out. </p><p></p><p>For all the people talking about Ron's connections to outside sources within the teamsters, taking away his ability to be effective as an independent leader (myself included),....</p><p></p><p>What about Galvans reaching out to another principle officer of another local?</p><p></p><p>Doesnt this also demonstrate that Galvans interests are pointing in the same direction as Ron's? He has made an attempt at involving himself as a delegate at the convention (he lost) he ran in the last election (he lost) and now he is attempting to rely on this "outside" source to draw votes for him, but what will friend. Zuckerman want in return?</p><p></p><p>Nothing is free at the Teamsters.</p><p></p><p>A person cant complain about Ron's involvement with other leaders and then rally to G who is doing the Identical thing.</p><p></p><p>Ron stood up on his own two feet when we first ran for office, and then, found himself connected. That's simple politics.</p><p></p><p>G is a two time loser, who didnt break the average dissention vote by much, trying to "be" connected before he ever takes office.</p><p></p><p>There is a huge difference between the two. </p><p></p><p>I respect Ron for his accomplishments at the local..but I can also be critical of his failures. </p><p></p><p>That is my middle ground.</p><p></p><p>TOS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 1403586, member: 17969"] Im not surprised. I am in NEITHER ones camp. None of the above would be my choice if it was an option. However, this time around, I will support Ron. Not because I "like" his leadership, but rather, I fear what G could do to the membership. Let me point something out. For all the people talking about Ron's connections to outside sources within the teamsters, taking away his ability to be effective as an independent leader (myself included),.... What about Galvans reaching out to another principle officer of another local? Doesnt this also demonstrate that Galvans interests are pointing in the same direction as Ron's? He has made an attempt at involving himself as a delegate at the convention (he lost) he ran in the last election (he lost) and now he is attempting to rely on this "outside" source to draw votes for him, but what will friend. Zuckerman want in return? Nothing is free at the Teamsters. A person cant complain about Ron's involvement with other leaders and then rally to G who is doing the Identical thing. Ron stood up on his own two feet when we first ran for office, and then, found himself connected. That's simple politics. G is a two time loser, who didnt break the average dissention vote by much, trying to "be" connected before he ever takes office. There is a huge difference between the two. I respect Ron for his accomplishments at the local..but I can also be critical of his failures. That is my middle ground. TOS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Fred Z to endorse the L-396 Richard G Slate
Top