Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Full-time driving
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JonFrum" data-source="post: 572606" data-attributes="member: 18044"><p>Sleeve,</p><p> </p><p>Are you saying your previous "driving duties" were <u>air</u> driving, not package car driving?</p><p> </p><p>And are you saying the unfavorable contract interpretation came directly from Sean O'Brien?</p><p> </p><p>If so, you are probably aware Sean O'Brien was on both the National and the New England Supplemental Negotiating Committees.</p><p> </p><p>When contract language is in dispute, arbitrators consult the two negotiating sides to see what their notes say, and what other versions of the language were proposed and rejected. The arbitrator then makes a decision based on what the two negotiating sides <u>thought</u> they were agreeing to. What they <u>intended</u> to agree to.</p><p> </p><p>Try to get a clarification from Sean O'Brien, or any one else in a position to know, as to what the negotiating parties <u>intended</u> when they discussed "driving duties."</p><p> </p><p>[Personally, I agree with your interpretation, because that's what the language says, and that's what was ratified by the members. But an arbitrator may see it differently. Just giving you a heads-up.]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JonFrum, post: 572606, member: 18044"] Sleeve, Are you saying your previous "driving duties" were [U]air[/U] driving, not package car driving? And are you saying the unfavorable contract interpretation came directly from Sean O'Brien? If so, you are probably aware Sean O'Brien was on both the National and the New England Supplemental Negotiating Committees. When contract language is in dispute, arbitrators consult the two negotiating sides to see what their notes say, and what other versions of the language were proposed and rejected. The arbitrator then makes a decision based on what the two negotiating sides [U]thought[/U] they were agreeing to. What they [U]intended[/U] to agree to. Try to get a clarification from Sean O'Brien, or any one else in a position to know, as to what the negotiating parties [U]intended[/U] when they discussed "driving duties." [Personally, I agree with your interpretation, because that's what the language says, and that's what was ratified by the members. But an arbitrator may see it differently. Just giving you a heads-up.] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Full-time driving
Top