refineryworker05
Well-Known Member
I don’t know about turmp’s finances, but he will con people.
Georgia, Georgia Always On My Mind ... Because Georgia Controls US Senate Leadership
- Thread starter Old Man Jingles
- Start date
PT Car Washer
Well-Known Member
He couldn't con enough Americans to vote for him this election.
refineryworker05
Well-Known Member
Well trump has never been popular. He ran for president twice and got 46% of the vote both times. Both times 54% of American voters wanted someone else to be president. That’s the facts.
Well if you believe the vote was legitimate...
refineryworker05
Well-Known Member
trump’s own lawyers aren’t saying there’s voter fraud in court why should I pretend there’s voter fraud?
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
Yet Trump had millions more vote for him in 2020 than Obama did in 2008 and 2012.
Stranger Things!
refineryworker05
Well-Known Member
Damn too bad trump wasn’t running against Obama vote totals from 8years ago. But in 2016 trump got 2.9million fewer votes than his main competitor and 54% of voters didn’t vote for him to be president. And in 2020 trump got 7million fewer votes than his main competitor and 54% of voters didn’t vote for him to be president again. Trump got 10million fewer votes than his biggest competitors across two elections.
Last edited:
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
No one cares who new yorkers and Californians want as President.
floridays
Well-Known Member
You're not so smart, Don't force me to use the D word.
floridays
Well-Known Member
Maybe it is not directed at individual voters?
Just a thought.
Again, your intelligence is lacking.
floridays
Well-Known Member
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
LOL ... the scent is not sweet.
I use to do a lot of work applying principles of Probability and Statistics in combination with set theory in predictive models.
I have not done that in over 20 years but the results as numbers start to pour in makes one wonder about the specific spikes that are developing in the data analysis.
Specifically, from a trending perspective, there are just too many inconsistencies to allow normal aberrations as the reason for those inconsistencies.
This is pure science and while not conclusive, indicative of being induced by specific actions in select locations ... there is no sense of ubiquity.
"Something is rotten in the state of Denmark!" my fellow citizens!
Re-Raise
Well-Known Member
Oh brother! You used the the words aberration and ubiquity to make it seem like you actually said something!
What are these “results as numbers start to pour in” that you are referencing?
The election was over a month ago
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
It's a logic thing ... you wouldn't understand!
Re-Raise
Well-Known Member
Whatever you say Marcellus
Statistical analysis is sort of like polls..you can skew them to reach any result that you want
floridays
Well-Known Member
Not really.
refineryworker05
Well-Known Member
All our votes as Americans count. Bottom line is trump received 46% of the vote in two presidential elections. It means twice 54% of Americans didn’t vote for him to be president. It means 10million more Americans combined voted for trump’s main competitors to be president than who voted for trump. That matters.
refineryworker05
Well-Known Member
That makes no sense, the bottomline is trump and his lawyers in court never say there is voter fraud. So why are Republican voters pretending that these cases are about voter fraud when trump’s own lawyers never allege voter fraud in court?
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
No one cares who new yorkers and Californians want as President.
Sportello
Well-Known Member
How's that working out?First brick knocked out of the wall.
If anyone wants to respond with actual knowledge of the order you've got to read it for yourself.
We'll see who is lazy and who talks out their backside.
It's four pages, you can read and digest in two minutes.
Enjoy your breakfast.
Similar threads
