Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
GPS Time Studies
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JustTired" data-source="post: 316252" data-attributes="member: 10234"><p>Yes , a lot of the time studies are screwed up. But some were just fine until they were adjusted for things like use of the diad, EDD, etc.</p><p> </p><p>If they had been re-time studied after the implementation of these various things (using the old method) then those time studies would more accuratley reflect the real world. But rather than re-study them, they were corrected using an abitrary number that was wishful thinking at best. </p><p> </p><p>Tell me how you can take away time from a system (EDD) that plans your day for you and the end result of that plan amounts to more miles driven and less SPORH. This ,of course, only holds true if you follow trace.</p><p> </p><p>No doubt that using the diad should make your day go a little easier and quicker. But the time savings is nowhere near the numbers projected by IE. </p><p> </p><p>You won't get an argument out of me that the areas need to be re-studied. I just have my doubts about using a system that, while maybe not completely broken, has not woked "as advertised" yet in most places.</p><p> </p><p>Whether it's a problem inherent to the system or just the laziness of the people implementing it, EDD just is not working. At least not working to anybodies benefit (the driver or the companies bottom line).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JustTired, post: 316252, member: 10234"] Yes , a lot of the time studies are screwed up. But some were just fine until they were adjusted for things like use of the diad, EDD, etc. If they had been re-time studied after the implementation of these various things (using the old method) then those time studies would more accuratley reflect the real world. But rather than re-study them, they were corrected using an abitrary number that was wishful thinking at best. Tell me how you can take away time from a system (EDD) that plans your day for you and the end result of that plan amounts to more miles driven and less SPORH. This ,of course, only holds true if you follow trace. No doubt that using the diad should make your day go a little easier and quicker. But the time savings is nowhere near the numbers projected by IE. You won't get an argument out of me that the areas need to be re-studied. I just have my doubts about using a system that, while maybe not completely broken, has not woked "as advertised" yet in most places. Whether it's a problem inherent to the system or just the laziness of the people implementing it, EDD just is not working. At least not working to anybodies benefit (the driver or the companies bottom line). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
GPS Time Studies
Top